arrow5 Comments
  1. Quazi Ahmed Hussain
    Jan 04 - 12:46 am

    Thanks for those junks. We are not interested in “Noise Champion” boxes. Of course non-photogs are the main customers and they will buy them.

  2. mike Corcoran
    Jan 04 - 8:41 am

    you my not be interested in noise champions, but most people in the know are. I guess so speak for self. all info is food for fodder.

  3. Quazi Ahmed Hussain
    Jan 04 - 8:52 am

    Very simple basic physics is: Bigger pixels = Cleaner images. Easy to see that the same manufacturer makes the full-frame sensors with comparatively less pixels – Why?

    Because knowledgeable people cannot be fooled. FYI, full-frame sensor area is more than double than that of 1.6 crop sensors.

    • Babs Cockrane
      Jan 10 - 9:14 am

      check out S/N and algorithms before u go out on the tech limb. Maybe MIT research and Stanford would be the place to start. Good luck with it.

  4. Jan Andersson
    Jan 04 - 11:27 am

    It’s the total lighted area that’s important. If you double the pixel count, each pixel is smaller and each takes up less light, but the number of pixels increased to fully compensate. See DxO tests, high pixel sensors are in fact better (and newer). Link: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/dxomark_sensor_for_benchmarking_cameras2.shtml.

Mobile Theme