Rumor: Nikon D5300 to Get New EXPEED 4 Processor & More | News | Forum

Please consider registering

Log In Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —


— Match —


— Forum Options —


Minimum search word length is 4 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

Topic RSS
Rumor: Nikon D5300 to Get New EXPEED 4 Processor & More
Read the original blog post
September 26, 2013
12:17 pm
Eric Reagan
Forum Posts: 2651
Member Since:
December 1, 2006

Nikon D5200

Along with the new D610, Nikon is rumored to introduce the D5300 as an entry-level APS-C format camera. The D5300 should feature the 24MP sensor and 39-point AF system we're all familiar with now.

Additionally, the camera is rumored to be the first to sport Nikon's new EXPEED 4 image processor.…

September 26, 2013
4:00 pm
Wally in Austin

Nikon 7000 to 7100, 5100 to 5200 to 5300, D300 to D300? Nikon.. Nikon? Bueller..... Bueller........

September 28, 2013
3:00 pm

Amen. Where's a worthy D300/s replacement?

September 29, 2013
8:29 am
Darren Kelly

I think the camera is called the Nikon D7100 - or move up to the D600. Either are more than worthy of replacing the D300.

What would you put into a D400 that would make it better than the 7100? I personally can't think of anything.


September 29, 2013
10:21 am
Eric Reagan
Forum Posts: 2651
Member Since:
December 1, 2006

Faster processor to clear the buffer coupled with an XQD card slot is the first thing that comes to mind. The buffer fro burst shooting is a major achilles heel for the D7100.

September 29, 2013
12:01 pm

@Eric--agreed. I don't even think many would mind the "extra" slot slot to be SD if it could keep up with frame/buffer rates. Maybe the first XQD/SD slotted-camera?
As a pro pj who has shot with the D1/h, D100, D200, D300, D300s, D7000 (and now using a D4), I don't think the D5xxx-series or the D7xxx-series have followed in the same vein as what a successor to the D300-series should be.
The 7100 seems to be a good high-end consumer camera, but not a successor or aimed at the same photog user base. Frame/buffer rate, AF speed-low-light-and accuracy, ruggedness of body build as well as shutter life, etc. As I even like the D7000 in many ways spec-wise, it was never built the same as the D300/s.
Nor do many (myself included) consider the D600 to be a replacement at all. It is a high-mp FX sensor in an amateur-built body, period. (Not to mention the problems with the camera).
Frankly, the same with the D800 to some extent. It surely fills a gap between a "lesser" body and a flagship D4, but was really not a replacement for the D700 user-base. It is a commercial-based user body with amazing resolution, but not for use in the trenches--photojournalism, sports, or any action/movement photography (as the D700 could produce).
Just seems to me that Nikon has kind of messed up their "lines" with the product naming (numbering)/release-sequence and user-base, especially if something is not in the works (such as what many I think, not just myself) would be wanting in a high-end (shall I say pro-sumer or affordable pro-) DX camera. ;)

Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 464

Currently Online:
6 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

eriemer: 6

byroninedmonton: 3

Kortney Jarman: 2

moniteur: 2

Cristi: 2

photography: 2

catfish252: 2

realkit2003: 2

marcus: 2

stevenjoen: 2

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 1160

Members: 411

Moderators: 0

Admins: 1

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 5

Topics: 2533

Posts: 4582

Newest Members: craigmason, shahzad698, justme, tokovimaxku, ckinfiniti, vinnyvetere, hogwaler, monk2go, Erik Hawkinson

Administrators: Eric Reagan: 2651