December 1, 2006
Now here's an idea. Why doesn't Canon bring out a high end camera that just takes great photos. Drop the video and make a better stills camera. Then bring out a second camera that shoots movies and call it a Video Camera. Now that would be new!!! Cameras that do both should not sit at the top of the range in my opinion.
I couldn't agree more. Why should we have to overpay for the next great camera because it has video we don't even want? The prosumer line of camera bodies are spectacular. I own the 7D and couldn't be happier. All I want in their next version is less noise at higher ISO and just improved overall performance in accordance with the times but screw the video. Keep the price of camera bodies down by eliminating video or offer two versions. The 7D Mark II should have a Mark II and a Mark IIv ("V" for video). Let us choose. I'd much rather save several hundred dollars by eliminating video and use that for a lens or accessories.
36 x 24 mm is quite something,but will never be mediun format. Yes I also would like to have mediun format quality . Doesn't everybody? And what the heck, who is printing A0
For me A1does the job and 20 mp is just enough!
What does a Nkon d800 bring extra? No, the mpix race should ended by now! Lets talk about quality, low and high ligth performace and speed
Most Users Ever Online: 464
Currently Browsing this Page:
Guest Posters: 859
Newest Members: Tom, cheney, john, Editor323, email@example.com, Fortkentdad, ridz, JK, js, fuster
Administrators: Eric Reagan (1866)