New Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 IS Lens Coming Soon?

by on November 5, 2012

in Canon

The Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM has been around for a long time; however, new rumors point to a possible replacement with Image Stabilization coming in the near future.  A rumored price point of $799 has been suggested (compare to $339 for the current version with rebates).

Additionally, pricing of $849 for the rumored Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS lens has been thrown out as well.

Which lens do you want to see more?

[via Canon Rumors]

email

 

{ 7 comments }

1 Matthew November 5, 2012 at 9:39 am

What’s up with Canon taking all of their sub-$500 lenses, adding Image Stabilization and bumping the price up 300%? They did it with the 24 and 28 and now the 50?

I’m just about done with Canon. They’ve been making that 50/1.4 for $350 for 20 years and now they suddenly have to bump the price up to $800!? I guess they have to appease the video crowd, but they’re abandoning their still-shooters in the process. Nobody needs IS in a 50/1.4 except for video shooters looking to stabilize their video.

Ridiculous. Even more ridiculous is the silly notion of a 24-70 f/4 when you have the 24-105 f/4 already on the table.

2 Stephen Cupp November 5, 2012 at 12:56 pm

If nobody needs IS in a 50 then the lens won’t sell well and Canon will get a clue that it is not acceptable to raise prices like that.

3 Dan November 5, 2012 at 10:42 am

I’ve been dying for a 50mm f/1.4 replacement for a long time. I can’t stand the focusing of the 50mm right now. The 85mm f/1.8 is so much better. But if Canon really does add IS and just about triple the price, I sure won’t be in the market. Canon keeps shooting themselves in the foot with these $800 non L prime lenses. I can’t imagine that these are selling well.

4 Scott November 5, 2012 at 2:58 pm

90% of Canon’s dslr sales are APS-C, yet their lens designers continue to act as though full frame is still the center of the world.
How about these:
A high-end 35mm f 1.4 (normal for APSC) that is not the size of a trash barrel.
A 35mm f2 that wasn’t designed in 1970.
A 23mm f2.8 (35mm equiv) or f2 that does not cost $800. Image Stabilization is frosting at this focal length…. Do you really do street or candids of people at 1/8 second?
A 58mm f1.4 (85mm equiv)
A high quality 70mm f2.8 (105 equiv)
50mm is neither here not there on APSC; a little long for general purpose, really too short for portraits.
Not interested.
The 24-70L would be more useful for APSC if it was (say) 16-70.
Neither of these new lenses is worth $800 to me.

5 Scott November 5, 2012 at 3:00 pm

Oops. “here nor there”

6 Tommy Stephansen December 10, 2012 at 4:34 am

I have to agree fully with Scott. The ASPC crowd (which includes myself) is not getting enough love from Canon.

7 Scott December 10, 2012 at 10:55 am

Reply to my own post:
Canon has apparently announced a new 35mm f2.
Canon giveth and they take-eth away. On the one hand, it’s a new design (maybe)
and it’s smaller than a trash can.
On the other hand, it has IS, so you can take pictures of your children at 1/4 second
(that’s silly), the lens hood is extra, and it’s
EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS! (Yes, I’m shouting.)

I think Canon has misjudged the market with this and the other new
non-L primes: 24 and 28 mm f2.8 non-L primes for $800.
They don’t promise anything amazing in terms of optics, they’re not particularly
fast and most importantly, they’re way too expensive for what they are,

Comments are closed on this post, but you can carry on the conversation in the Photography Bay Forum.

Previous post:

Next post: