<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic G2 and G10 ISO and Noise Compared to Canon Rebel T2i</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/#comment-198998</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Reagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 13:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=13660#comment-198998</guid>
		<description>@Pete - Thanks for the comment.  I&#039;ve tried that before and was accused of being everything from a fanboy to a heretic, which is why I went back to the pixel vs. pixel comparison.  I&#039;m inclined to agree with you though.  

At any rate, I&#039;ve included the original files, so you can compare them at the same magnification or even make the same sized prints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pete &#8211; Thanks for the comment.  I&#8217;ve tried that before and was accused of being everything from a fanboy to a heretic, which is why I went back to the pixel vs. pixel comparison.  I&#8217;m inclined to agree with you though.  </p>
<p>At any rate, I&#8217;ve included the original files, so you can compare them at the same magnification or even make the same sized prints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/#comment-198988</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 05:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=13660#comment-198988</guid>
		<description>This review would be more useful if the images were of the same magnification in terms of the actual object. The t2i will produce a higher resolution image so comparing at one-to-one pixel would not be an accurate comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This review would be more useful if the images were of the same magnification in terms of the actual object. The t2i will produce a higher resolution image so comparing at one-to-one pixel would not be an accurate comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/#comment-198899</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 23:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=13660#comment-198899</guid>
		<description>Really want to know if the G2/G10 are an image quality upgrade from the G1, or just additional bells and whistles.  Could you compare them?

Also: in your samples, the Panasonics look significantly sharper than the Rebel.  Would the Rebel be better with a different lens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really want to know if the G2/G10 are an image quality upgrade from the G1, or just additional bells and whistles.  Could you compare them?</p>
<p>Also: in your samples, the Panasonics look significantly sharper than the Rebel.  Would the Rebel be better with a different lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/07/29/panasonic-g2-and-g10-iso-and-noise-compared-to-canon-rebel-t2i/#comment-198808</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=13660#comment-198808</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric, I am a pitching coach. I need a good frames per second camera with telephoto. Video can be in bursts. I have Canon lenses from other equipment but it seems Canon is not the way to go. Can you recommend anything?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric, I am a pitching coach. I need a good frames per second camera with telephoto. Video can be in bursts. I have Canon lenses from other equipment but it seems Canon is not the way to go. Can you recommend anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-10 06:29:12 -->
