<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung NX10 vs. Canon Rebel T2i ISO Comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2010/06/03/samsung-nx10-vs-canon-rebel-t2i-iso-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/06/03/samsung-nx10-vs-canon-rebel-t2i-iso-comparison/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HM</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/06/03/samsung-nx10-vs-canon-rebel-t2i-iso-comparison/#comment-195526</link>
		<dc:creator>HM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=12503#comment-195526</guid>
		<description>Miserere, the E-PL1 also runs full time live view and does very well in this department. [ http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl1/page17.asp ] DP Review compared it to the T1i and Kx! (It also beat out the Nikon D3000 by a wide margin.) I just think Samsung has either used a poor quality sensor, or has real bad noise filtering. It&#039;s come up short in noise on almost all tests.
I think TR is right and the NEX-5 is going to be the low-light EVIL king. Too bad it requires a PhD in Platypus Psychology to figure out and use the menus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miserere, the E-PL1 also runs full time live view and does very well in this department. [ <a href="http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl1/page17.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusepl1/page17.asp</a> ] DP Review compared it to the T1i and Kx! (It also beat out the Nikon D3000 by a wide margin.) I just think Samsung has either used a poor quality sensor, or has real bad noise filtering. It&#8217;s come up short in noise on almost all tests.<br />
I think TR is right and the NEX-5 is going to be the low-light EVIL king. Too bad it requires a PhD in Platypus Psychology to figure out and use the menus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miserere</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/06/03/samsung-nx10-vs-canon-rebel-t2i-iso-comparison/#comment-195494</link>
		<dc:creator>Miserere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=12503#comment-195494</guid>
		<description>I think you need to bear one very important thing in mind here: The NX10&#039;s sensor is turned ON all the time, increasing its temperature and thus, noise levels. It&#039;s the price to pay for live-view.

I&#039;d be interested in seeing a repeat test where both cameras are set to live-view and left on for a minute or so before photos are taken, always through live-view.

Cheers,

&lt;i&gt;—M.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you need to bear one very important thing in mind here: The NX10&#8242;s sensor is turned ON all the time, increasing its temperature and thus, noise levels. It&#8217;s the price to pay for live-view.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in seeing a repeat test where both cameras are set to live-view and left on for a minute or so before photos are taken, always through live-view.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p><i>—M.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TR</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2010/06/03/samsung-nx10-vs-canon-rebel-t2i-iso-comparison/#comment-195493</link>
		<dc:creator>TR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 21:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=12503#comment-195493</guid>
		<description>Samsung needs to update their sensor. This old sensor seems to be lagging behind. 

I am more interedted in Sony Nex-5. When is that review is coming?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Samsung needs to update their sensor. This old sensor seems to be lagging behind. </p>
<p>I am more interedted in Sony Nex-5. When is that review is coming?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-10 05:41:17 -->
