<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 and 60mm f/2.8 IS Patents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pixu</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/#comment-185539</link>
		<dc:creator>Pixu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=9180#comment-185539</guid>
		<description>Canon 70-200 2.8 IS second version and non IS, I&#039;m pretty happy, I knew about the IS version but not about the non IS, this is quite exciting! Next the f/4 versions maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon 70-200 2.8 IS second version and non IS, I&#8217;m pretty happy, I knew about the IS version but not about the non IS, this is quite exciting! Next the f/4 versions maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/#comment-185486</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=9180#comment-185486</guid>
		<description>But what is the advantages of this new contruction. Late version is very good enough. So I don&#039;t see any information about improvements. I hope I will see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what is the advantages of this new contruction. Late version is very good enough. So I don&#8217;t see any information about improvements. I hope I will see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canonmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/#comment-185442</link>
		<dc:creator>canonmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=9180#comment-185442</guid>
		<description>nice find, its soon hopefully at ces 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice find, its soon hopefully at ces 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/#comment-185439</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=9180#comment-185439</guid>
		<description>@Hamza - You&#039;re right about the two models.  Presumably, this patent is for the refreshed version of both...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Hamza &#8211; You&#8217;re right about the two models.  Presumably, this patent is for the refreshed version of both&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamza</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/12/05/new-canon-70-200mm-f2-8-and-60mm-f2-8-is-patents/#comment-185436</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=9180#comment-185436</guid>
		<description>I thought there was already an IS model available for 70-200mm f2.8
There are 2 models, one is non-IS and one is IS model which is considerably more expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there was already an IS model available for 70-200mm f2.8<br />
There are 2 models, one is non-IS and one is IS model which is considerably more expensive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-10 04:22:01 -->
