Comments on: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG OS Lens Hands-on Review http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/24/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-hands-on-review/ The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Eddie http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/24/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-hands-on-review/#comment-193451 Eddie Sat, 17 Apr 2010 03:55:07 +0000 http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8363#comment-193451 i wanted to purchase 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG OS before i do that... it's compatible with DSLR Sony Alpha A350. im a begginer on camera, so i seeking for advise. btw im a student, so cannot affort to purchase expensive lenses... t.q i wanted to purchase 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG OS before i do that… it’s compatible with DSLR Sony Alpha A350. im a begginer on camera, so i seeking for advise. btw im a student, so cannot affort to purchase expensive lenses…

t.q

]]> By: Andre Hanekom http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/24/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-hands-on-review/#comment-186666 Andre Hanekom Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:57:45 +0000 http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8363#comment-186666 http://www.neutralday.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-review/ . Go here and see a decent review. http://www.neutralday.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-review/ . Go here and see a decent review.

]]> By: Andre Hanekom http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/24/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-hands-on-review/#comment-186664 Andre Hanekom Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:42:31 +0000 http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8363#comment-186664 In my opinion this is a very unfair and poor review. If you take any lens never mind the quality or price and take shots at 300mm at 1/8th of a second and try to use them as a test of the lens' image capabilities, with or without image stabalisation the test becomes utterly pointless. Also taking a photo of a moving subject at 1/25th of a second and expecting it to be in sharp focus you understand nothing about what you are shooting. If you want to test the focus on moving subjects cancel out the blur by shooting at faster shutter speeds. It is not fair to post such a negative review, of a lens that according to other reviews seems at the very least decent, if you did not make the effort to conduct your test in an environment that is acceptable. At least you made note of the fact that the surroundings were not ideal. In my opinion this is a very unfair and poor review. If you take any lens never mind the quality or price and take shots at 300mm at 1/8th of a second and try to use them as a test of the lens’ image capabilities, with or without image stabalisation the test becomes utterly pointless. Also taking a photo of a moving subject at 1/25th of a second and expecting it to be in sharp focus you understand nothing about what you are shooting. If you want to test the focus on moving subjects cancel out the blur by shooting at faster shutter speeds. It is not fair to post such a negative review, of a lens that according to other reviews seems at the very least decent, if you did not make the effort to conduct your test in an environment that is acceptable. At least you made note of the fact that the surroundings were not ideal.

]]> By: Sky_walker http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/24/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-os-lens-hands-on-review/#comment-181324 Sky_walker Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:31:23 +0000 http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8363#comment-181324 we could use comparison against older Sigma lenses more than against Canon L lens... it was obvious since very first rumors that Canon L will be better than this one so... duh... we could use comparison against older Sigma lenses more than against Canon L lens… it was obvious since very first rumors that Canon L will be better than this one so… duh…

]]>