<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1D Mark IV Hands-On Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/23/canon-1d-mark-iv-hands-on-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/23/canon-1d-mark-iv-hands-on-review/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:49:55 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sonorman</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/23/canon-1d-mark-iv-hands-on-review/#comment-181134</link>
		<dc:creator>sonorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8282#comment-181134</guid>
		<description>For me as a long time Canon user and Mark III owner the new Mark IV is a big disappointment. I was hoping for a new &quot;game changer&quot;, not for a face lift. 

The good thing is, I can save my money on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me as a long time Canon user and Mark III owner the new Mark IV is a big disappointment. I was hoping for a new &#8220;game changer&#8221;, not for a face lift. </p>
<p>The good thing is, I can save my money on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canonmonster</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/23/canon-1d-mark-iv-hands-on-review/#comment-181078</link>
		<dc:creator>canonmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8282#comment-181078</guid>
		<description>cant wait til i get my mine.
you&#039;re so lucky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cant wait til i get my mine.<br />
you&#8217;re so lucky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/23/canon-1d-mark-iv-hands-on-review/#comment-181069</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8282#comment-181069</guid>
		<description>The 1D mkiv appears to potentially have a better AF sensor than the D3/s, which has a wider spread of more crossed sensor points.  However there&#039;s nothing which distinguishes it as being superior on paper.

The sensor has the same pixel pitch as the 1ds mkiii/5d mkii sensor, so I expect sensitivity to be at least as good if not better.  Not 102,400 better though.

I have to say that it&#039;s nice that Canon and Nikon have brought the fast PJ/sports camera up to this level.  These cameras are simply amazing.

One Achilles heel for this new Canon though: 28 frame raw buffer?  Nikon&#039;s is almost double.  Will Canon offer an upgrade?  And why isn&#039;t it standard if they do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1D mkiv appears to potentially have a better AF sensor than the D3/s, which has a wider spread of more crossed sensor points.  However there&#8217;s nothing which distinguishes it as being superior on paper.</p>
<p>The sensor has the same pixel pitch as the 1ds mkiii/5d mkii sensor, so I expect sensitivity to be at least as good if not better.  Not 102,400 better though.</p>
<p>I have to say that it&#8217;s nice that Canon and Nikon have brought the fast PJ/sports camera up to this level.  These cameras are simply amazing.</p>
<p>One Achilles heel for this new Canon though: 28 frame raw buffer?  Nikon&#8217;s is almost double.  Will Canon offer an upgrade?  And why isn&#8217;t it standard if they do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
