<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 5D Mark II to Get 24p/25p Video Capability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/#comment-185594</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8145#comment-185594</guid>
		<description>Maybe they&#039;ve put off the release to add 60fps as an option.  hmmmm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they&#8217;ve put off the release to add 60fps as an option.  hmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/#comment-182061</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8145#comment-182061</guid>
		<description>Nice, but does Canon remember that 5D II is camera first of all? I am happy of these video improvements, but when photo improvements? It sounds so strange that a 2.300 euro equipment does not let you set a minimum shutter speed in auto iso mode or set limits up and down for auto ISO... These are features really easy to add through a firmware update and competitors have it.

Please read here and sigh it: http://www.petitiononline.com/Canon5D/

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, but does Canon remember that 5D II is camera first of all? I am happy of these video improvements, but when photo improvements? It sounds so strange that a 2.300 euro equipment does not let you set a minimum shutter speed in auto iso mode or set limits up and down for auto ISO&#8230; These are features really easy to add through a firmware update and competitors have it.</p>
<p>Please read here and sigh it: <a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/Canon5D/" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/Canon5D/</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will G</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/#comment-180914</link>
		<dc:creator>Will G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8145#comment-180914</guid>
		<description>Sounds great.  But more than 24P(which you can already convert with software from 30P to 24P), I am more interested in having 60P to allow me to slow down some action.  If it allowed a faster frame rate than that for Super Slo Mo, this camera may never be outdone for a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great.  But more than 24P(which you can already convert with software from 30P to 24P), I am more interested in having 60P to allow me to slow down some action.  If it allowed a faster frame rate than that for Super Slo Mo, this camera may never be outdone for a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/#comment-180889</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8145#comment-180889</guid>
		<description>Coming form a videographer/photographer this is really nice to hear! I hope they fix other things with it, but I would really like to be able to be able to record 720p at 60fps as well. That would make my 5D fulfill nearly everything I need!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coming form a videographer/photographer this is really nice to hear! I hope they fix other things with it, but I would really like to be able to be able to record 720p at 60fps as well. That would make my 5D fulfill nearly everything I need!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photographer / Videographer</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/20/canon-5d-mark-ii-to-get-24p25p-video-capability/#comment-180803</link>
		<dc:creator>Photographer / Videographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8145#comment-180803</guid>
		<description>At least and at last Canon said something!

- JUST IN CASE it isn&#039;t clear enough to Canon:

Frame rates MUST be the standard ones (29.97fps for &quot;30p&quot; mode, and so on)

BTW, we don&#039;t see a real technical reason why to wait until 2010 for a Firmware that has been tested as Beta since MONTHS ago... (as mentioned in http://5dmark2.wordpress.com blog long ago)

It&#039;s probably being improved, but it looks like more a marketing strategy than a real technical reason.

Would be great, and a smart move too, to include some other fixes/improvements in the same update, considering that this camera has HUGE potential inside.

Anyway, thumbs up to Canon for this announcement, and also special thanks to all those people who helped in any way to achieve this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least and at last Canon said something!</p>
<p>- JUST IN CASE it isn&#8217;t clear enough to Canon:</p>
<p>Frame rates MUST be the standard ones (29.97fps for &#8220;30p&#8221; mode, and so on)</p>
<p>BTW, we don&#8217;t see a real technical reason why to wait until 2010 for a Firmware that has been tested as Beta since MONTHS ago&#8230; (as mentioned in <a href="http://5dmark2.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://5dmark2.wordpress.com</a> blog long ago)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably being improved, but it looks like more a marketing strategy than a real technical reason.</p>
<p>Would be great, and a smart move too, to include some other fixes/improvements in the same update, considering that this camera has HUGE potential inside.</p>
<p>Anyway, thumbs up to Canon for this announcement, and also special thanks to all those people who helped in any way to achieve this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-10 04:19:43 -->
