<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll and Questions: HDR Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:47:26 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/#comment-181645</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8071#comment-181645</guid>
		<description>For me the lamp shade on the left back looks more blown out in the 1st image than in the 2nd image, the same applies even more for the reflection of presumably a TV screen on the left glass door (just above the armchair) - therefore the 2nd image appears to be a true HDR and the 1st a simulated HDR (or however you want to call it). 

In both cases a good technique to get more out of an image. 

Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the lamp shade on the left back looks more blown out in the 1st image than in the 2nd image, the same applies even more for the reflection of presumably a TV screen on the left glass door (just above the armchair) &#8211; therefore the 2nd image appears to be a true HDR and the 1st a simulated HDR (or however you want to call it). </p>
<p>In both cases a good technique to get more out of an image. </p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kim</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/#comment-181002</link>
		<dc:creator>kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8071#comment-181002</guid>
		<description>im saying the 2nd one is HDR - i know the carpet looks overX. however, the top one looks like the carpet is underX.

And some other things, I still think that 2nd one is HDR. 

(now that I opened my mouf&#039;, im probably wrong) and I love HDR.

Love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im saying the 2nd one is HDR &#8211; i know the carpet looks overX. however, the top one looks like the carpet is underX.</p>
<p>And some other things, I still think that 2nd one is HDR. </p>
<p>(now that I opened my mouf&#8217;, im probably wrong) and I love HDR.</p>
<p>Love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy D.</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/#comment-180720</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8071#comment-180720</guid>
		<description>I agree that the first one looks HDR. the carpet in the second one is blown out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the first one looks HDR. the carpet in the second one is blown out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Miriello</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/#comment-180710</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Miriello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8071#comment-180710</guid>
		<description>Great post. I&#039;m a huge fan of exposure fusion via Photomatix Pro and use it on a daily basis for real estate work. For a little more information, check out our podcast on using exposure fusion through Photomatix Pro @ http://www.realestatephotographypodcast.com/blog/2009/9/21/episode-109-photomatix-pro-and-exposure-fusion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I&#8217;m a huge fan of exposure fusion via Photomatix Pro and use it on a daily basis for real estate work. For a little more information, check out our podcast on using exposure fusion through Photomatix Pro @ <a href="http://www.realestatephotographypodcast.com/blog/2009/9/21/episode-109-photomatix-pro-and-exposure-fusion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realestatephotographypodcast.com/blog/2009/9/21/episode-109-photomatix-pro-and-exposure-fusion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/10/18/poll-and-questions-hdr-images/#comment-180709</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=8071#comment-180709</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing the 1st one is the HDR shot.  Looks to me that it exposes a little more thru the back french doors to see the outside railing.  But I could be wrong.   Either way both look great if your goal was covering the indoor room.  Where I have seen HDR excel is in places where say you have a large window looking outside.  Getting the indoor lit to see and keeping the outside scene looking good.  Maybe not as easy in LR, but again, I could just need to work harder in LR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing the 1st one is the HDR shot.  Looks to me that it exposes a little more thru the back french doors to see the outside railing.  But I could be wrong.   Either way both look great if your goal was covering the indoor room.  Where I have seen HDR excel is in places where say you have a large window looking outside.  Getting the indoor lit to see and keeping the outside scene looking good.  Maybe not as easy in LR, but again, I could just need to work harder in LR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
