<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus E-P1 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:19:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-183987</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-183987</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the candid review of the EP-1....though I think some people are over-reacting to your write-up. I was torn between the GF1 and the EP-1 for a while. The news of the EP-2 being launched soon didn&#039;t help matters much. Finally, the idea of having IBIS won me over to the side of Olympus, due to the fact that I have a number of legacy glass. I appreciate the fact that you highlighted HD&#039;s reply and his opinion about the EP-1 which is bang on with what I was thinking... the EP-1 would be great for manual lenses. I can do without the sluggish AF and just concentrate on having fun with my old Takumar, Exaktar and Minolta optics. The best part being I don&#039;t have to develop and scan my film shots this time round. Keep up the good work. Even though I may not always agree with your viewpoints.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the candid review of the EP-1&#8230;.though I think some people are over-reacting to your write-up. I was torn between the GF1 and the EP-1 for a while. The news of the EP-2 being launched soon didn&#8217;t help matters much. Finally, the idea of having IBIS won me over to the side of Olympus, due to the fact that I have a number of legacy glass. I appreciate the fact that you highlighted HD&#8217;s reply and his opinion about the EP-1 which is bang on with what I was thinking&#8230; the EP-1 would be great for manual lenses. I can do without the sluggish AF and just concentrate on having fun with my old Takumar, Exaktar and Minolta optics. The best part being I don&#8217;t have to develop and scan my film shots this time round. Keep up the good work. Even though I may not always agree with your viewpoints.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-180181</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 06:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-180181</guid>
		<description>@Voyager - Perhaps you are right and I&#039;m not creative enough.  However, this review is based on the overall performance of the camera and not my creative workarounds for the E-P1&#039;s deficiencies.

I think most of us want a camera that focuses quickly and tracks subjects in continuous AF mode.  The E-P1 doesn&#039;t.  I would also like for Live View to function without lag.  Put anything but the fastest of SD cards in the camera and some of the Art Modes are practically unusable for all but stationary subjects.  Even the the lag you get while framing your shot is enough to drive you mad.  Sorry if that offends you as someone who owns an official forum for the E-P1, but that doesn&#039;t pass muster for me.  And, I&#039;m not going to give it a pass and recommend it to Photography Bay readers just because I can &quot;make it work.&quot;

I give much bigger kudos Panasonic with the GH1.  Its overall performance, autofocus and video capture is much more satisfying than the E-P1.  

Additionally, if you think the E-P1 produces images &quot;that are even far better than the 5D Mark II,&quot; then we clearly operate on different standards for product performance and you will likely not agree with anything that I have to say and I can understand why you discredit this review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Voyager &#8211; Perhaps you are right and I&#8217;m not creative enough.  However, this review is based on the overall performance of the camera and not my creative workarounds for the E-P1&#8217;s deficiencies.</p>
<p>I think most of us want a camera that focuses quickly and tracks subjects in continuous AF mode.  The E-P1 doesn&#8217;t.  I would also like for Live View to function without lag.  Put anything but the fastest of SD cards in the camera and some of the Art Modes are practically unusable for all but stationary subjects.  Even the the lag you get while framing your shot is enough to drive you mad.  Sorry if that offends you as someone who owns an official forum for the E-P1, but that doesn&#8217;t pass muster for me.  And, I&#8217;m not going to give it a pass and recommend it to Photography Bay readers just because I can &#8220;make it work.&#8221;</p>
<p>I give much bigger kudos Panasonic with the GH1.  Its overall performance, autofocus and video capture is much more satisfying than the E-P1.  </p>
<p>Additionally, if you think the E-P1 produces images &#8220;that are even far better than the 5D Mark II,&#8221; then we clearly operate on different standards for product performance and you will likely not agree with anything that I have to say and I can understand why you discredit this review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyager</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-180180</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-180180</guid>
		<description>Well then you&#039;re not being creative enough with it...because today I managed to get a Canon P&amp;S camera to do something just as well as a DSLR would. The E-P1 is no different, in fact much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then you&#8217;re not being creative enough with it&#8230;because today I managed to get a Canon P&amp;S camera to do something just as well as a DSLR would. The E-P1 is no different, in fact much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-180155</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-180155</guid>
		<description>I appreciate your comment; however, saying the camera can do &quot;anything&quot; you want it to is a severe stretch.  I stand my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your comment; however, saying the camera can do &#8220;anything&#8221; you want it to is a severe stretch.  I stand my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voyager</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-180140</link>
		<dc:creator>Voyager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-180140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little offended by this review. The E-P1 is a camera that can do ANYTHING you want it to, and can easily adapt to any lens that you want it to. In owning the official forum for the camera, I can see the community that it builds, and in our own forum gallery I have found photos that are even far better than the 5D Mark II. If you really want to give me the pretty camera that takes bad photos example, then you&#039;re really not a true photographer yourself, because a photographer would realize that they can take great photos with any camera that has full manual controls. Quit whining about the lack of a viewfinder, if you want to gripe about this then you&#039;ve honestly lost any rights to review a camera that was obviously not made to have one in my eyes. Anyways, I totally discredit this review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little offended by this review. The E-P1 is a camera that can do ANYTHING you want it to, and can easily adapt to any lens that you want it to. In owning the official forum for the camera, I can see the community that it builds, and in our own forum gallery I have found photos that are even far better than the 5D Mark II. If you really want to give me the pretty camera that takes bad photos example, then you&#8217;re really not a true photographer yourself, because a photographer would realize that they can take great photos with any camera that has full manual controls. Quit whining about the lack of a viewfinder, if you want to gripe about this then you&#8217;ve honestly lost any rights to review a camera that was obviously not made to have one in my eyes. Anyways, I totally discredit this review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterB</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-178593</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-178593</guid>
		<description>Well I have had the E-P1 about 1 month now. I had Nikon film cameras for 30 years, Nikkormat FT2, Nikon F and Nikon FM, the latter being my camera of choice for 25 years.  My other film camera was a Robot Star II, a small, interchangeable camera with a motor drive from the 1950s.

I have been waiting years for something like the E-P1 to come along. Something affordable, compact and versatile.  There is no doubt the E-P1 is not perfect, but it is the only camera that ticks all the boxes that are relevant to me. I have an absolute hoot using it with a collection of old Olympus OM lenses and even the Schneider 40mm f/1.9 from my Robot Star.

The E-P1 is a revelation.  A small package of photographic joy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I have had the E-P1 about 1 month now. I had Nikon film cameras for 30 years, Nikkormat FT2, Nikon F and Nikon FM, the latter being my camera of choice for 25 years.  My other film camera was a Robot Star II, a small, interchangeable camera with a motor drive from the 1950s.</p>
<p>I have been waiting years for something like the E-P1 to come along. Something affordable, compact and versatile.  There is no doubt the E-P1 is not perfect, but it is the only camera that ticks all the boxes that are relevant to me. I have an absolute hoot using it with a collection of old Olympus OM lenses and even the Schneider 40mm f/1.9 from my Robot Star.</p>
<p>The E-P1 is a revelation.  A small package of photographic joy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-178471</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-178471</guid>
		<description>Hi Eric....First Of All, Just To To Let You Know That I Am A No Pro In Photography...But Have Been Doing It as A Hobby For The Past 35 years. I Log In Here To Know The Latest New and Rumors In The Camera world....Kudos To That! But When It Comes To Reviewing Cameras, You Are Way Out Of League. The Way In which you Test and Review Your Cameras are In My Opinion, Too Casual and Below Standards. Even For A Casual Shooter Like Me, The Whole Review Looks Jumbled and Going Nowhere. Besides,I was among The First To Test The EP-1 In My Country and Find it Solid and Most Importantly, The Jpeg Images Out of Camera Are Gorgeous!...And Coming from A Seasoned Nikon User, I Personally Think You Got Your Review All Wrong!...Well, That&#039;s Just My Opinion.....Thanks ....UJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eric&#8230;.First Of All, Just To To Let You Know That I Am A No Pro In Photography&#8230;But Have Been Doing It as A Hobby For The Past 35 years. I Log In Here To Know The Latest New and Rumors In The Camera world&#8230;.Kudos To That! But When It Comes To Reviewing Cameras, You Are Way Out Of League. The Way In which you Test and Review Your Cameras are In My Opinion, Too Casual and Below Standards. Even For A Casual Shooter Like Me, The Whole Review Looks Jumbled and Going Nowhere. Besides,I was among The First To Test The EP-1 In My Country and Find it Solid and Most Importantly, The Jpeg Images Out of Camera Are Gorgeous!&#8230;And Coming from A Seasoned Nikon User, I Personally Think You Got Your Review All Wrong!&#8230;Well, That&#8217;s Just My Opinion&#8230;..Thanks &#8230;.UJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-178438</link>
		<dc:creator>HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-178438</guid>
		<description>Well, I love this camera. I bought 3 cameras this year (Canon T1i to replace my older dSLR, Canon SD960 IS point and shoot for the wife who needs 720p HD video, and the e-p1). This camera is simply remarkable. Sure, the T1i is cleaner ( I shoot only w/ prime lenses) but there is something that the T1i cannot do is the form factor. This camera fits into my briefcase. It is so light, I take it with me to work every day. I can&#039;t lug my SLR around. The SD960 P&amp;S is a joke but it works for the wife. This camera shoots at f/3.5 in street light w/ Image Stabilization  @ ISO 1600 better than my Canon using a f/2.8 or f/1.4 lens.

And why is that I find it so remarkable: The ability to use legacy glass. I have a M42 adapter, OM adapter, a Leica M mount adapter, and a C mount (Bolex 16mm film adapter). When you pair this camera with something like a Cosina Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f/1.4 lens, the images are stunning. You can get cheap 50mm f/1.8 M42 lens at the flea market for $5. I just ordered a Cosmicar 12.5mm film lens off ebay. Ive seen Vimeo videos and Flickr shots and they are quite truly stunning. This is why so many people who can&#039;t afford Leica M8.2 are salivating. My Cosmicar lens (16mm C Mount matches the 4/3 sensor so I don&#039;t need to worry about crop 1.3,1.5,2x crop ratio) was $10. Where can you buy a prime lens for $10. Heck, I&#039;ve seen people retrofit a Pentax 110 lens on a e-p1 ( &amp; Panasonic G1/GH1). I am so sold on micro 4/3 now that I am looking for a second camera body (possibly panasonic).

As for AF, who cares. Manual focus is a pleasure on this camera. Hit the info button a few times and you will get the rifle&#039;s cross-hair. That thing is amazing, it helps you with composition by aligning marks via symmetry. The 7X manual focus assist is fast. I focus faster manually than I do with other cameras. 

In all, with this camera, I have fallen back in love with photography. Researching what lens work and what doesn&#039;t. It is so refreshing to manually use a manual aperture ring w/ legacy glass. The best camera out there is the camera that makes you feel comfortable to use. Judging from the tweets, blogs, forums, this camera has it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I love this camera. I bought 3 cameras this year (Canon T1i to replace my older dSLR, Canon SD960 IS point and shoot for the wife who needs 720p HD video, and the e-p1). This camera is simply remarkable. Sure, the T1i is cleaner ( I shoot only w/ prime lenses) but there is something that the T1i cannot do is the form factor. This camera fits into my briefcase. It is so light, I take it with me to work every day. I can&#8217;t lug my SLR around. The SD960 P&amp;S is a joke but it works for the wife. This camera shoots at f/3.5 in street light w/ Image Stabilization  @ ISO 1600 better than my Canon using a f/2.8 or f/1.4 lens.</p>
<p>And why is that I find it so remarkable: The ability to use legacy glass. I have a M42 adapter, OM adapter, a Leica M mount adapter, and a C mount (Bolex 16mm film adapter). When you pair this camera with something like a Cosina Voigtlander Nokton 40mm f/1.4 lens, the images are stunning. You can get cheap 50mm f/1.8 M42 lens at the flea market for $5. I just ordered a Cosmicar 12.5mm film lens off ebay. Ive seen Vimeo videos and Flickr shots and they are quite truly stunning. This is why so many people who can&#8217;t afford Leica M8.2 are salivating. My Cosmicar lens (16mm C Mount matches the 4/3 sensor so I don&#8217;t need to worry about crop 1.3,1.5,2x crop ratio) was $10. Where can you buy a prime lens for $10. Heck, I&#8217;ve seen people retrofit a Pentax 110 lens on a e-p1 ( &amp; Panasonic G1/GH1). I am so sold on micro 4/3 now that I am looking for a second camera body (possibly panasonic).</p>
<p>As for AF, who cares. Manual focus is a pleasure on this camera. Hit the info button a few times and you will get the rifle&#8217;s cross-hair. That thing is amazing, it helps you with composition by aligning marks via symmetry. The 7X manual focus assist is fast. I focus faster manually than I do with other cameras. </p>
<p>In all, with this camera, I have fallen back in love with photography. Researching what lens work and what doesn&#8217;t. It is so refreshing to manually use a manual aperture ring w/ legacy glass. The best camera out there is the camera that makes you feel comfortable to use. Judging from the tweets, blogs, forums, this camera has it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-178424</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-178424</guid>
		<description>The ISO Comparison Chart looks very suspicious. The text in the iso 800 is sharper that the one in iso 400 and 200 (and the 400 sharper than 200). However the red cloth looks sharper at iso 200 than iso 400 and 800.

It looks like your iso measurements are corrupted by poor focusing !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ISO Comparison Chart looks very suspicious. The text in the iso 800 is sharper that the one in iso 400 and 200 (and the 400 sharper than 200). However the red cloth looks sharper at iso 200 than iso 400 and 800.</p>
<p>It looks like your iso measurements are corrupted by poor focusing !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/27/olympus-e-p1-review/#comment-178421</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=7085#comment-178421</guid>
		<description>@Other Eric - I appreciate your comment and I&#039;m sorry if you are offended; however, I stand by my review of the E-P1.  Form factor is only important to me if the camera works the way I need it to.  

I&#039;m glad you like the camera and appreciate the points you&#039;ve made as to why it works for you.  I disagree with your suggestion that a Canon Rebel series or Nikon D5000 feels like it will break when you squeeze on it though.  Additionally, I don&#039;t find the E-P1 to be all that smaller than the entry-level DSLRs you mention.  It&#039;s a bit of a stretch to call the E-P1 a pocket-cam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Other Eric &#8211; I appreciate your comment and I&#8217;m sorry if you are offended; however, I stand by my review of the E-P1.  Form factor is only important to me if the camera works the way I need it to.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you like the camera and appreciate the points you&#8217;ve made as to why it works for you.  I disagree with your suggestion that a Canon Rebel series or Nikon D5000 feels like it will break when you squeeze on it though.  Additionally, I don&#8217;t find the E-P1 to be all that smaller than the entry-level DSLRs you mention.  It&#8217;s a bit of a stretch to call the E-P1 a pocket-cam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
