<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great Telephoto Zoom Lenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:06:38 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wildspirit</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177876</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 04:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177876</guid>
		<description>I have a new Pentax K-7 (quite a step from the *istDS) with the old Quantaray 70-300 AF/macro Zoom and the smc Pentax DA 50-200 AF--ultralite and fast compared to anything else I&#039;ve used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new Pentax K-7 (quite a step from the *istDS) with the old Quantaray 70-300 AF/macro Zoom and the smc Pentax DA 50-200 AF&#8211;ultralite and fast compared to anything else I&#8217;ve used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177856</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177856</guid>
		<description>I use the Sony 70-400 for telephoto shooting. Expensive but I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Sony 70-400 for telephoto shooting. Expensive but I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177801</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177801</guid>
		<description>I use the Canon 100-400 LIS, with a 20D giving 160 to 640. Amazing shots can be had with this, but is too big for street photography! Otherwise I use my 70-200 F4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the Canon 100-400 LIS, with a 20D giving 160 to 640. Amazing shots can be had with this, but is too big for street photography! Otherwise I use my 70-200 F4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard D</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177790</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177790</guid>
		<description>I use Canon 70-200 L IS, in both f/4 and 2.8. The 2.8 i use for weddings but i prefer to travel with the 4. Both beautiful lenses but the f/4 is better value and MUCH lighter IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Canon 70-200 L IS, in both f/4 and 2.8. The 2.8 i use for weddings but i prefer to travel with the 4. Both beautiful lenses but the f/4 is better value and MUCH lighter IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177782</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177782</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Canon lens that everyone wants is the 70-200 f\2.8 IS USM, not the non-IS version you posted. But from reading your blog it would appear you&#039;re more of a Nikon fan, so I&#039;ll forgive you.

;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Canon lens that everyone wants is the 70-200 f\2.8 IS USM, not the non-IS version you posted. But from reading your blog it would appear you&#8217;re more of a Nikon fan, so I&#8217;ll forgive you.</p>
<p>;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Mundschenk</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177721</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Mundschenk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177721</guid>
		<description>I have an 85mm 1.4 for sale if you are interested</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an 85mm 1.4 for sale if you are interested</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam W</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177697</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177697</guid>
		<description>The Nikon 85mm 1.4 is known to be one of Nikon&#039;s sweetest lenses.

Like many, it is on my wish list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nikon 85mm 1.4 is known to be one of Nikon&#8217;s sweetest lenses.</p>
<p>Like many, it is on my wish list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SToronto</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177696</link>
		<dc:creator>SToronto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177696</guid>
		<description>I use a Canon 70-200 2.8. Great lens so far. In particular I used it at an air show last year with satisfactory results. I want to get in nice and tight this year so I am renting a 100-400. Excited to use it in a few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a Canon 70-200 2.8. Great lens so far. In particular I used it at an air show last year with satisfactory results. I want to get in nice and tight this year so I am renting a 100-400. Excited to use it in a few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dino</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177675</link>
		<dc:creator>Dino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 06:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177675</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using the Canon 70-200 4L IS and for me it&#039;s the best compromise between image quality, weight and of course the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using the Canon 70-200 4L IS and for me it&#8217;s the best compromise between image quality, weight and of course the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrés</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/08/18/great-telephoto-zoom-lenses/#comment-177672</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrés</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 05:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6934#comment-177672</guid>
		<description>I just bought the Canon 70-300 IS USM F4-5.6 and I&#039;ll be getting it in a few weeks.  I read great things about the 70-200 F4 L, but I can&#039;t afford the IS version and I can&#039;t live without IS.  I borrowed a beautiful Canon 200mm F2.8 L prime a few weeks ago and I had a really hard time with blur.  At those focal lengths, a tripod is a must unless you have IS.  I can only imagine what it must be like at 300mm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought the Canon 70-300 IS USM F4-5.6 and I&#8217;ll be getting it in a few weeks.  I read great things about the 70-200 F4 L, but I can&#8217;t afford the IS version and I can&#8217;t live without IS.  I borrowed a beautiful Canon 200mm F2.8 L prime a few weeks ago and I had a really hard time with blur.  At those focal lengths, a tripod is a must unless you have IS.  I can only imagine what it must be like at 300mm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
