<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700x Rumor Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/06/27/nikon-d700x-rumor-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/06/27/nikon-d700x-rumor-update/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Neal Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/06/27/nikon-d700x-rumor-update/#comment-174850</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6096#comment-174850</guid>
		<description>Video is no gimmick. The inevitable death of print journalism means that photograohers will be combining still images with video and audio into multimedia videos.  21mp on the Canon 5D mk2 is completely unecessary, whereas the low light/low noise capability of my Nikon D700 is truly amazing, but I wish it had HD video, which is what makes the Canon a better all-rounder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Video is no gimmick. The inevitable death of print journalism means that photograohers will be combining still images with video and audio into multimedia videos.  21mp on the Canon 5D mk2 is completely unecessary, whereas the low light/low noise capability of my Nikon D700 is truly amazing, but I wish it had HD video, which is what makes the Canon a better all-rounder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabby</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/06/27/nikon-d700x-rumor-update/#comment-174559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=6096#comment-174559</guid>
		<description>A D700x similar to current D700 but with video. Doesn&#039;t seem likely to me. I for one would see this as a backward step. Anyone prepared to shell out this kind of money wants quality not gimmicks. What is wanted by most consumers at this level is the superb D700 with a higher resolution sensor. Anything else will be a flop, You heard it here first.

Rab</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A D700x similar to current D700 but with video. Doesn&#8217;t seem likely to me. I for one would see this as a backward step. Anyone prepared to shell out this kind of money wants quality not gimmicks. What is wanted by most consumers at this level is the superb D700 with a higher resolution sensor. Anything else will be a flop, You heard it here first.</p>
<p>Rab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
