Comments on: Kodak’s Final Notice

By: T.W. Kanobe

T.W. Kanobe — Tue, 12 May 2009 13:17:39 +0000

Kodak has to rethink this policy-I mean -hey it’s- Kodak -the grandfather of photography. Are they THAT hard up for cash??? If they STILL want to be a player in the photo game they have to get more in tune to what’s happening outside of the shutter – we’re not talking instamatic camera photos anymore. But if you had it bad with Kodak, Adobe’s photo sharing site changed names and I lost all of my photo albums, favorite sites, and pofile while I was “in the middle of a download session”. I have to reload to the new name site everything I posted before, IF I can find the orginals. I might not used Adobe’s Photoshop.com web site anymore, it seems to have too many high school photography class project postings – the kind there the teacher says “If you post it on the internet, you’ll get extra credit”.

By: Bruce Lewis

Bruce Lewis — Sun, 10 May 2009 09:35:58 +0000

Roger, some of the newer Kodak wireless digital photo frames also work with Media RSS. Are you sure yours isn’t one of those?

By: genaro orengo

genaro orengo — Sat, 09 May 2009 14:04:50 +0000

I, recently, received this message from kodak gallery. Instead of buying prints, I just bought the archival CD with all the JPEGs. I have not used kodak gallery for some time and did not see a need for buying prints at this time of pictures that are a couple of years old. Just my take on things.

By: Roger Madsen

Roger Madsen — Sat, 09 May 2009 07:06:22 +0000

This really sucks. I have the Kodak wireless digital frame and the wireless part only works with Kodak gallery. So it’s not enough that I bought the frame for a lot of money, now I have to pay a yearly fee to use it aswell.