<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D400 Rumor Updates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/#comment-142014</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4925#comment-142014</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait, I am buying a D700 now and using the battery grip on it. At least I will be able to sell my D300 at a higher price now- before the D400 is announced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait, I am buying a D700 now and using the battery grip on it. At least I will be able to sell my D300 at a higher price now- before the D400 is announced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/#comment-138963</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4925#comment-138963</guid>
		<description>That picture you posted was debunked about a month ago... Not saying the D400 isnt going to happen, but that isnt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture you posted was debunked about a month ago&#8230; Not saying the D400 isnt going to happen, but that isnt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/#comment-138890</link>
		<dc:creator>Micah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4925#comment-138890</guid>
		<description>Beware the credibility of rumors on the internet are decreasing.  *yawn*

I suspect 14mp because it would mean an existing sensor with Nikon tweaking ala D3x.  The D3x became an inevitability when Sony announced the sensor in January of 2008.  Likewise, it&#039;s only a matter of time before Nikon starts using Sony&#039;s 14mp sensor in something, provided that they can make it as pretty at higher ISO as the d300/d90.  That something would make sense in a dx00 level body, since Nikon&#039;s marketing makes sense in the way it tends introduce features in higher level bodies and trickle them down to lower, unlike Sony who&#039;s marketing still confuses me.

That said, why even bother?  12mp and 14mp are so close that such a camera would be a snoozer.  Except to bring down the price of the d300.  Which is already nudged down in the consumer&#039;s minds by the quite excellent d90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware the credibility of rumors on the internet are decreasing.  *yawn*</p>
<p>I suspect 14mp because it would mean an existing sensor with Nikon tweaking ala D3x.  The D3x became an inevitability when Sony announced the sensor in January of 2008.  Likewise, it&#8217;s only a matter of time before Nikon starts using Sony&#8217;s 14mp sensor in something, provided that they can make it as pretty at higher ISO as the d300/d90.  That something would make sense in a dx00 level body, since Nikon&#8217;s marketing makes sense in the way it tends introduce features in higher level bodies and trickle them down to lower, unlike Sony who&#8217;s marketing still confuses me.</p>
<p>That said, why even bother?  12mp and 14mp are so close that such a camera would be a snoozer.  Except to bring down the price of the d300.  Which is already nudged down in the consumer&#8217;s minds by the quite excellent d90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/17/nikon-d400-rumor-updates/#comment-138884</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4925#comment-138884</guid>
		<description>Beware that the creditability of Nikonrumors is decreasing.  Today it reports someone see 35mm f/1.4 in stock and thinks that it should be the &quot;new&quot; AF-S 35mm f/1.4 FX.  However, NR does not know that there is a AIS 35mm f/1.4 still in production...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware that the creditability of Nikonrumors is decreasing.  Today it reports someone see 35mm f/1.4 in stock and thinks that it should be the &#8220;new&#8221; AF-S 35mm f/1.4 FX.  However, NR does not know that there is a AIS 35mm f/1.4 still in production&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-10 00:00:58 -->
