<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samsung NX Series &#8211; A Closer Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/samsung-nx-series-a-closer-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/samsung-nx-series-a-closer-look/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/samsung-nx-series-a-closer-look/#comment-131229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 03:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4806#comment-131229</guid>
		<description>I think is very probable that:
-standarzoom: 16-50mm (24-75mm f/2.8)
-telezoom: 50-150mm (75-225mm f/2.8)
-prime pancake: 24mm (36mm f/XX)

Some pictures show &quot;F1.2&quot; a faster lens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think is very probable that:<br />
-standarzoom: 16-50mm (24-75mm f/2.8)<br />
-telezoom: 50-150mm (75-225mm f/2.8)<br />
-prime pancake: 24mm (36mm f/XX)</p>
<p>Some pictures show &#8220;F1.2&#8243; a faster lens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RB</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/samsung-nx-series-a-closer-look/#comment-131200</link>
		<dc:creator>RB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 02:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4806#comment-131200</guid>
		<description>Guys: There is no way this (if it ever comes out) can have a K-mount.

The flange-to-sensor distance is simply not large enough to accomodate PK lenses.

This will most definitely be a new &quot;modern&quot; mount, possibly with an adapter to mount K-mount lenses.

There would be no real point mimicking the K-mount with its limitations anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys: There is no way this (if it ever comes out) can have a K-mount.</p>
<p>The flange-to-sensor distance is simply not large enough to accomodate PK lenses.</p>
<p>This will most definitely be a new &#8220;modern&#8221; mount, possibly with an adapter to mount K-mount lenses.</p>
<p>There would be no real point mimicking the K-mount with its limitations anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
