<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Casio EX-FC100 Hands-On Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:44:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-186804</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-186804</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got one of these and between my daughters &amp; I we&#039;ve beat the heck out of this little camera. I&#039;ve got to say it&#039;s my all time best point-and-shoot camera...finally unseating my Fuji F30. On the Casio, the low light is only so-so, but everything else is pretty good. Controls can be tight, but they are squeezing quite a few controls in a tight space. All in all if it failed to function today, I&#039;d replace it with the exact same camera. It&#039;s *that* good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got one of these and between my daughters &amp; I we&#8217;ve beat the heck out of this little camera. I&#8217;ve got to say it&#8217;s my all time best point-and-shoot camera&#8230;finally unseating my Fuji F30. On the Casio, the low light is only so-so, but everything else is pretty good. Controls can be tight, but they are squeezing quite a few controls in a tight space. All in all if it failed to function today, I&#8217;d replace it with the exact same camera. It&#8217;s *that* good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techguru</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-184879</link>
		<dc:creator>techguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-184879</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an very good camera because very compact design, measuring just 99.8 x 58.5 x 22.6mm and weighing approximately 180g including battery and memory card.We have a feeling that this is a good quality since it does not feel like a plastic camera considering to the materials.The buttons are also quite excellent and are logically placed and user interactive.This means that anyone who has used an ordinary digital camera before can easily operate the Casio Exilim High Speed EX-FC100 too. For more information http://www.techarena.in/review/8865-casio-exilim-high-speed-ex-fc100-digital-camera.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an very good camera because very compact design, measuring just 99.8 x 58.5 x 22.6mm and weighing approximately 180g including battery and memory card.We have a feeling that this is a good quality since it does not feel like a plastic camera considering to the materials.The buttons are also quite excellent and are logically placed and user interactive.This means that anyone who has used an ordinary digital camera before can easily operate the Casio Exilim High Speed EX-FC100 too. For more information <a href="http://www.techarena.in/review/8865-casio-exilim-high-speed-ex-fc100-digital-camera.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.techarena.in/review/8865-casio-exilim-high-speed-ex-fc100-digital-camera.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-136265</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-136265</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s unfortunate. Now I&#039;m torn between this and the Panasonic TZ7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s unfortunate. Now I&#8217;m torn between this and the Panasonic TZ7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-135870</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-135870</guid>
		<description>@Joe - No zoom during video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe &#8211; No zoom during video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-135856</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-135856</guid>
		<description>Could you zoom in and out while shooting video?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you zoom in and out while shooting video?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-135358</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-135358</guid>
		<description>@Omar - If still quality is what you are after, I would be looking at a Canon or Sony point and shoot. On the Casio, I think your high-FPS shots will print just fine up to about 8x10 if you are in good lighting. 

@Cleo - You are correct, the 1000fps setting is not HD.  I actually think it&#039;s below VGA.

@David - It&#039;s going to depend on the quality you are recording at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Omar &#8211; If still quality is what you are after, I would be looking at a Canon or Sony point and shoot. On the Casio, I think your high-FPS shots will print just fine up to about 8&#215;10 if you are in good lighting. </p>
<p>@Cleo &#8211; You are correct, the 1000fps setting is not HD.  I actually think it&#8217;s below VGA.</p>
<p>@David &#8211; It&#8217;s going to depend on the quality you are recording at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleo Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-135296</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleo Bond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-135296</guid>
		<description>I was just thinking, how many Mpix does it record , when its set to 1000FPS ?
it cant still be HD quality can it ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking, how many Mpix does it record , when its set to 1000FPS ?<br />
it cant still be HD quality can it ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Autolooper</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-133724</link>
		<dc:creator>Autolooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-133724</guid>
		<description>Wow! Looks like this might be the perfect upgrade to my current Casio! I&#039;ve been sticking with a 2006 model since I didn&#039;t care for Casio&#039;s experiments with H264. :P I was excited to hear that Casio&#039;s 2009 models don&#039;t use H264.

I&#039;ve been curious about any recording limitations such as the UK 10-minute limit, does that exist in the US model. Also, how is the audio recording and what happens when the frame rate is turned up?

I recently tried and returned a device because it could record at 60 FPS but I was disappointed that the frames seemed to drop to less than 20 in less than ideal lighting. I&#039;m wondering, is it possible or feasible to record in 1000 FPS and then reduce it down to 60 in post-processing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Looks like this might be the perfect upgrade to my current Casio! I&#8217;ve been sticking with a 2006 model since I didn&#8217;t care for Casio&#8217;s experiments with H264. :P I was excited to hear that Casio&#8217;s 2009 models don&#8217;t use H264.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been curious about any recording limitations such as the UK 10-minute limit, does that exist in the US model. Also, how is the audio recording and what happens when the frame rate is turned up?</p>
<p>I recently tried and returned a device because it could record at 60 FPS but I was disappointed that the frames seemed to drop to less than 20 in less than ideal lighting. I&#8217;m wondering, is it possible or feasible to record in 1000 FPS and then reduce it down to 60 in post-processing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-133042</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-133042</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious as to how much record time you&#039;d get with say..a 1 gig SD card? Any idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious as to how much record time you&#8217;d get with say..a 1 gig SD card? Any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/03/04/casio-ex-fc100-hands-on-review/#comment-132919</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 05:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4813#comment-132919</guid>
		<description>look at all the flicker in those florescent tubes, haha, that looks like it could be a blast. 
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at all the flicker in those florescent tubes, haha, that looks like it could be a blast.<br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
