<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Canon 1-Series Updates at PMA 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:44:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/#comment-110048</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4515#comment-110048</guid>
		<description>Can you provide more information on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide more information on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/#comment-109782</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4515#comment-109782</guid>
		<description>@Larry - No.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Larry &#8211; No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/#comment-109738</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 11:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4515#comment-109738</guid>
		<description>Canon Rumors already reported this 3-4 days ago. They your source?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Canon Rumors already reported this 3-4 days ago. They your source?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devin</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/#comment-109064</link>
		<dc:creator>Devin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4515#comment-109064</guid>
		<description>Everyone has a &quot;reliable source&quot; on their information. I doubt that very many people really know about any updates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has a &#8220;reliable source&#8221; on their information. I doubt that very many people really know about any updates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/02/10/no-canon-1-series-updates-at-pma-2009/#comment-109035</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4515#comment-109035</guid>
		<description>Great... another f*cking Rebel.

Way to forget your pro lineup Canon.

That D3 is looking better by the minute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great&#8230; another f*cking Rebel.</p>
<p>Way to forget your pro lineup Canon.</p>
<p>That D3 is looking better by the minute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
