<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon Lens Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-176804</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-176804</guid>
		<description>I wish the techies at Nikon could make a 200mm f/1.8 VRII with the nano coat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish the techies at Nikon could make a 200mm f/1.8 VRII with the nano coat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-174245</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-174245</guid>
		<description>NIKON:

I want a 24-135 2.8 AFS VR. FX format. I want it now!!!

Have money

Hurry up............please!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NIKON:</p>
<p>I want a 24-135 2.8 AFS VR. FX format. I want it now!!!</p>
<p>Have money</p>
<p>Hurry up&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;please!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gurbally</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-173718</link>
		<dc:creator>gurbally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-173718</guid>
		<description>I will wait for the PMA 2009 announcement...if Nikon does not come out with fast primes (24mm/35mm and 85mm) and something like 70-200mm f4 VR, I will switch to Canon. 
Nikon has been very slow in responding to demands from professionals. Probably it is now more geared towards the cunsumer market. Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will wait for the PMA 2009 announcement&#8230;if Nikon does not come out with fast primes (24mm/35mm and 85mm) and something like 70-200mm f4 VR, I will switch to Canon.<br />
Nikon has been very slow in responding to demands from professionals. Probably it is now more geared towards the cunsumer market. Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-165265</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-165265</guid>
		<description>10-22mm f/2.8 ... no I&#039;m not joking, 85mm f/1.2, 50mm f/1.2, 35mm f/1.4 AF-S, Nano coat, FX lenses.
Come on Nikon!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10-22mm f/2.8 &#8230; no I&#8217;m not joking, 85mm f/1.2, 50mm f/1.2, 35mm f/1.4 AF-S, Nano coat, FX lenses.<br />
Come on Nikon!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-141096</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-141096</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Switching back from Canon to Nikon, I regret Nikon doesn&#039;t offer glass similar to some of Canon&#039;s: MPE-65 macro (goes from 1:1 to 5:1!), and very portable and stabilised 70-200 f4 and 300mm f4 (I had the current nikon 300mm f4 it&#039;s a gem!) - how long should I still wait for the 300 mm f4 VR - or would this be too much competition with the current, heavy and expensive f2,8 VR?
Here in Belgium rebates started on the 80-400 (-100 euros), the 70-200 VR (-150 euros) ... but also on some of the newest glass.
Jan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Switching back from Canon to Nikon, I regret Nikon doesn&#8217;t offer glass similar to some of Canon&#8217;s: MPE-65 macro (goes from 1:1 to 5:1!), and very portable and stabilised 70-200 f4 and 300mm f4 (I had the current nikon 300mm f4 it&#8217;s a gem!) &#8211; how long should I still wait for the 300 mm f4 VR &#8211; or would this be too much competition with the current, heavy and expensive f2,8 VR?<br />
Here in Belgium rebates started on the 80-400 (-100 euros), the 70-200 VR (-150 euros) &#8230; but also on some of the newest glass.<br />
Jan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-130912</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-130912</guid>
		<description>I did not see any Nikon releases at PMA2009.  Is the new 70-200 dead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did not see any Nikon releases at PMA2009.  Is the new 70-200 dead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-110067</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-110067</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to see an AFS version of the 80-400mm vr in an affordable price range meaning under $2K</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to see an AFS version of the 80-400mm vr in an affordable price range meaning under $2K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-106288</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-106288</guid>
		<description>I was told that they would be making a 70-210 with a lower minimal focal length incorporating new things  and keep the old 70-200
just what i heard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was told that they would be making a 70-210 with a lower minimal focal length incorporating new things  and keep the old 70-200<br />
just what i heard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nikonfan</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-96001</link>
		<dc:creator>nikonfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-96001</guid>
		<description>Geez!
Who needs these, release those fast primes for dx, the 50mm 1.4 G was a good start but make them wider!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geez!<br />
Who needs these, release those fast primes for dx, the 50mm 1.4 G was a good start but make them wider!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Rivard</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2009/01/11/nikon-lens-rumors/#comment-94068</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Rivard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=4062#comment-94068</guid>
		<description>I was hoping that Nikon would come out with a 70-200mm f/4 VR to compete with Canons 70-200mm f/4 IS. Why would nikon make a perfectly good lens even bigger and more expensive by adding a half stop?? I am genuinely thinking of switching to Canon because of the 70-200 f/4 IS, for its convenience of price and weight. I really hope Nikon will have a 70-200 f/4 in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping that Nikon would come out with a 70-200mm f/4 VR to compete with Canons 70-200mm f/4 IS. Why would nikon make a perfectly good lens even bigger and more expensive by adding a half stop?? I am genuinely thinking of switching to Canon because of the 70-200 f/4 IS, for its convenience of price and weight. I really hope Nikon will have a 70-200 f/4 in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
