<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 5D Mark II Review at Pro Photo Home</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/06/canon-5d-mark-ii-review-at-pro-photo-home/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/06/canon-5d-mark-ii-review-at-pro-photo-home/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:44:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Poagao</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/06/canon-5d-mark-ii-review-at-pro-photo-home/#comment-60890</link>
		<dc:creator>Poagao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3603#comment-60890</guid>
		<description>Yeah, those comments are pretty much on the mark, I think. I was a little surprised P-Bay linked to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, those comments are pretty much on the mark, I think. I was a little surprised P-Bay linked to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwylie</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/06/canon-5d-mark-ii-review-at-pro-photo-home/#comment-60837</link>
		<dc:creator>jwylie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 05:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3603#comment-60837</guid>
		<description>You should read through the comments. They are funny. Lots of posters slam his review, and 2 updates have since been added with backtracking remarks.

http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/canon-1-series-digital-slr-eos-5d/80038-canon-canon-5d-camera-mkii-video-mode-review-discussion.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should read through the comments. They are funny. Lots of posters slam his review, and 2 updates have since been added with backtracking remarks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/canon-1-series-digital-slr-eos-5d/80038-canon-canon-5d-camera-mkii-video-mode-review-discussion.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/canon-1-series-digital-slr-eos-5d/80038-canon-canon-5d-camera-mkii-video-mode-review-discussion.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poagao</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/06/canon-5d-mark-ii-review-at-pro-photo-home/#comment-60732</link>
		<dc:creator>Poagao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 02:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3603#comment-60732</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a horrible review. He uses AF for professional film shooting? I&#039;ve never seen that happen myself. MF is the only thing that works for me. Sure, if you want 12-minute-long takes of the camera constantly working to keep up with the action, this isn&#039;t the camera for you. Not sure what would be. Maybe a point-and-shoot with inf. focus and IS or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a horrible review. He uses AF for professional film shooting? I&#8217;ve never seen that happen myself. MF is the only thing that works for me. Sure, if you want 12-minute-long takes of the camera constantly working to keep up with the action, this isn&#8217;t the camera for you. Not sure what would be. Maybe a point-and-shoot with inf. focus and IS or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
