<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D3X Announced</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:26:07 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-59304</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-59304</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve taken my medication, it&#039;s all OK now...all warm and fuzzy, nice nice nice...LOL

Nobody listens to us!! Not even Eric will jump in here and say we&#039;re a bunch of dorks and that we really should be out somewhere taking pics with our &quot;Tuesday cameras&quot;!! That is of course - if you&#039;re not in Europe or farther east...in which case, you really ought to be using your &quot;Wednesday camera&quot;.

None of it matters, I think Leica has foreshadowed the future with their S-line of gear, which when combined with the existence of the likes of Olympus and their micro 4/3rds, spells the possible demise of all these old formats. The barriers that have existed will disappear and be replaced by a new one - brand name. We&#039;ll just buy a brand that we like and can afford without regard to what format it may or may not be. Each brand will be it&#039;s OWN format. It&#039;s coming slowly, even the medium-format guys who have been espousing open-format products aren&#039;t getting any traction. Ultimately, there will be as many formats as there are manufacturers.

There, another rant...please feel free to rant back - maybe we can get Photo Bay a bad rep....one that rivals dpreview...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve taken my medication, it&#8217;s all OK now&#8230;all warm and fuzzy, nice nice nice&#8230;LOL</p>
<p>Nobody listens to us!! Not even Eric will jump in here and say we&#8217;re a bunch of dorks and that we really should be out somewhere taking pics with our &#8220;Tuesday cameras&#8221;!! That is of course &#8211; if you&#8217;re not in Europe or farther east&#8230;in which case, you really ought to be using your &#8220;Wednesday camera&#8221;.</p>
<p>None of it matters, I think Leica has foreshadowed the future with their S-line of gear, which when combined with the existence of the likes of Olympus and their micro 4/3rds, spells the possible demise of all these old formats. The barriers that have existed will disappear and be replaced by a new one &#8211; brand name. We&#8217;ll just buy a brand that we like and can afford without regard to what format it may or may not be. Each brand will be it&#8217;s OWN format. It&#8217;s coming slowly, even the medium-format guys who have been espousing open-format products aren&#8217;t getting any traction. Ultimately, there will be as many formats as there are manufacturers.</p>
<p>There, another rant&#8230;please feel free to rant back &#8211; maybe we can get Photo Bay a bad rep&#8230;.one that rivals dpreview&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-59100</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-59100</guid>
		<description>Haha, I wish I needed a new camera because it was tuesday!! Honestly, I was very adamant about how I was wishing for the same thing Peter; I too wanted the 18mp&#039;s, and high ISO capabilities, but I knew it wasn&#039;t really going to happen, because they needed a camera for the studio guys, how many of us shooting in controlled lighting situations are actually going to be shooting over 50 or 100 ISO?  

I&#039;m trying to look on the bright side and not complain, we didn&#039;t get the camera some of us wanted and there not going to make it because we, the few, want it. 

I can tell you that a lot of the, at times, unwarranted want for mega mega-pixel&#039;s in camera&#039;s is driven by the client; they believe more is better, and they want you to shoot more, so either you loose the client or you shoot bigger, not necessarily better camera&#039;s. Nikon is trying to get back back all the shooter&#039;s it lost to Canon, the only way there going to be able to do that is by making it bigger. I can&#039;t tell you how many times I&#039;ve been looked at like I&#039;m crazy because I shoot Nikon digital cameras. 

I&#039;m not saying that I agree with it, I don&#039;t, but it&#039;s a consumer driven market guys, you either follow the trends or you get off at the next stop. Nikon isn&#039;t Canon, they don&#039;t have the money to build it all. 

And I was just joking with you Roderick, rants are great! ;)
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, I wish I needed a new camera because it was tuesday!! Honestly, I was very adamant about how I was wishing for the same thing Peter; I too wanted the 18mp&#8217;s, and high ISO capabilities, but I knew it wasn&#8217;t really going to happen, because they needed a camera for the studio guys, how many of us shooting in controlled lighting situations are actually going to be shooting over 50 or 100 ISO?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m trying to look on the bright side and not complain, we didn&#8217;t get the camera some of us wanted and there not going to make it because we, the few, want it. </p>
<p>I can tell you that a lot of the, at times, unwarranted want for mega mega-pixel&#8217;s in camera&#8217;s is driven by the client; they believe more is better, and they want you to shoot more, so either you loose the client or you shoot bigger, not necessarily better camera&#8217;s. Nikon is trying to get back back all the shooter&#8217;s it lost to Canon, the only way there going to be able to do that is by making it bigger. I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I&#8217;ve been looked at like I&#8217;m crazy because I shoot Nikon digital cameras. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that I agree with it, I don&#8217;t, but it&#8217;s a consumer driven market guys, you either follow the trends or you get off at the next stop. Nikon isn&#8217;t Canon, they don&#8217;t have the money to build it all. </p>
<p>And I was just joking with you Roderick, rants are great! ;)<br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-59058</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-59058</guid>
		<description>A bit of interesting reading on this very subject:

http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/
http://www.bythom.com/nikond3xcomments.htm

Repent and return to film!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of interesting reading on this very subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/" rel="nofollow">http://luminous-landscape.com/whatsnew/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.bythom.com/nikond3xcomments.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.bythom.com/nikond3xcomments.htm</a></p>
<p>Repent and return to film!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-59057</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-59057</guid>
		<description>Different cameras for different uses!?!? 
Geezus...next you&#039;ll be telling us we need a different one because it&#039;s Tuesday...hook, line and sinker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different cameras for different uses!?!?<br />
Geezus&#8230;next you&#8217;ll be telling us we need a different one because it&#8217;s Tuesday&#8230;hook, line and sinker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58830</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 04:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58830</guid>
		<description>Wow Roderick... umm.... 

Two machines for two different jobs. 
-peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Roderick&#8230; umm&#8230;. </p>
<p>Two machines for two different jobs.<br />
-peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58806</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58806</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s $8K, I think I&#039;ll save $5k on the body and buy a Canon 5DMkIII and put the extra $$ for some glass.

This thing looks like it intended to compete with the Canon 1DsMkIII, which we can all easily assume is well down the road to being replaced as this comes out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s $8K, I think I&#8217;ll save $5k on the body and buy a Canon 5DMkIII and put the extra $$ for some glass.</p>
<p>This thing looks like it intended to compete with the Canon 1DsMkIII, which we can all easily assume is well down the road to being replaced as this comes out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58778</link>
		<dc:creator>Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 03:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58778</guid>
		<description>Huh, it looks like a half-bred retread of some older Nikon and Sony products...
Not good.
Nikon has succumbed to the forces of evil and have joined the dark side.
They would have been wiser to make a camera of 18mp. At this level of resolution, they likely could have maintained most of the D3&#039;s speed/ISO virtues while combining it with more than ample resolution.
Yes buyer&#039;s you too have been deceived and coddled into believing you need 24mp...when really just a bottle of Extenze would have been good to cure your insecurity.
It&#039;s all so wonderful to read the reviews of these uber pixelated pieces of crap...&quot;oh look, if you shoot above ISO 400 it&#039;s just too noisy&quot;...ya great, go figure...these dinks just dump this cheap tacky crap on the blind...
Nikon would be better advised to start making doormats so Canon can walk all over them.
God it all makes me sick...
Wunder what&#039;s going on with Mamiya and their DL28 camera? Not a bad deal when looking at Nikon&#039;s latest retread. Hmm, maybe Leica will wake up to realize they&#039;ve overpriced their S2 camera, which when it finally comes out will be obsolete anyways...
It&#039;s all just a big techno-jerk-off...just like when CD&#039;s came out...they&#039;re so great...now everyone is buying turntables again...

Only the rightly guided ones will know not to throw out their film gear just yet. The rest of you will burn like smelly cowpies for your shortsighted-ness.

Huh, I feel moderately better now...I&#039;m sure the smug look on my butt-ugly face will be wiped away when I hear the camera mfr&#039;s have all taken their place at the government trough behind the banker&#039;s and auto-maker&#039;s...the end is near. Repent now and return to film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh, it looks like a half-bred retread of some older Nikon and Sony products&#8230;<br />
Not good.<br />
Nikon has succumbed to the forces of evil and have joined the dark side.<br />
They would have been wiser to make a camera of 18mp. At this level of resolution, they likely could have maintained most of the D3&#8217;s speed/ISO virtues while combining it with more than ample resolution.<br />
Yes buyer&#8217;s you too have been deceived and coddled into believing you need 24mp&#8230;when really just a bottle of Extenze would have been good to cure your insecurity.<br />
It&#8217;s all so wonderful to read the reviews of these uber pixelated pieces of crap&#8230;&#8221;oh look, if you shoot above ISO 400 it&#8217;s just too noisy&#8221;&#8230;ya great, go figure&#8230;these dinks just dump this cheap tacky crap on the blind&#8230;<br />
Nikon would be better advised to start making doormats so Canon can walk all over them.<br />
God it all makes me sick&#8230;<br />
Wunder what&#8217;s going on with Mamiya and their DL28 camera? Not a bad deal when looking at Nikon&#8217;s latest retread. Hmm, maybe Leica will wake up to realize they&#8217;ve overpriced their S2 camera, which when it finally comes out will be obsolete anyways&#8230;<br />
It&#8217;s all just a big techno-jerk-off&#8230;just like when CD&#8217;s came out&#8230;they&#8217;re so great&#8230;now everyone is buying turntables again&#8230;</p>
<p>Only the rightly guided ones will know not to throw out their film gear just yet. The rest of you will burn like smelly cowpies for your shortsighted-ness.</p>
<p>Huh, I feel moderately better now&#8230;I&#8217;m sure the smug look on my butt-ugly face will be wiped away when I hear the camera mfr&#8217;s have all taken their place at the government trough behind the banker&#8217;s and auto-maker&#8217;s&#8230;the end is near. Repent now and return to film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58757</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58757</guid>
		<description>@Zablit - Actually the comparison was to Canon&#039;s flagship, the 1Ds Mark III . . . along with a little bit of facetiousness.  Obviously, not everyone got it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zablit &#8211; Actually the comparison was to Canon&#8217;s flagship, the 1Ds Mark III . . . along with a little bit of facetiousness.  Obviously, not everyone got it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zablit</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58749</link>
		<dc:creator>Zablit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58749</guid>
		<description>Comparing the 3000$CA Canon to the 8000$US Nikon in favor of the later (specially concerning a difference of 3.5mp) is a tiny bit obtuse, don&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparing the 3000$CA Canon to the 8000$US Nikon in favor of the later (specially concerning a difference of 3.5mp) is a tiny bit obtuse, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Gingher</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/12/01/nikon-d3x-announced/#comment-58406</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Gingher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 14:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3498#comment-58406</guid>
		<description>Looks good from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
