<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Annie Au</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-175428</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-175428</guid>
		<description>I am think Nikon will not announce the D400 &amp; the D800 this year (2009). They may have problem to make it happen - better than the Canon&#039;s. So I am considering to turn to Canon (within the next month or shorter). Everyone are welcome to join me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am think Nikon will not announce the D400 &amp; the D800 this year (2009). They may have problem to make it happen &#8211; better than the Canon&#8217;s. So I am considering to turn to Canon (within the next month or shorter). Everyone are welcome to join me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzaidi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-174678</link>
		<dc:creator>mzaidi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-174678</guid>
		<description>I want... i want...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want&#8230; i want&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAGATH</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-142155</link>
		<dc:creator>JAGATH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-142155</guid>
		<description>I want buy a D400 camera. How can I buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want buy a D400 camera. How can I buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-91530</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-91530</guid>
		<description>Amen to the Kyniek comment!!!  We do not need more megapixals.  We need better dynamic range and noise control.  I have great 20 x 30 pics with a D70 at 6 megapixals.  A d400 also needs a dx sensor.  It is much cheaper to by wider lenses then it is to buy longer lenses.  Fx sensors have their place and market, but the dx sensor has it&#039;s own place as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to the Kyniek comment!!!  We do not need more megapixals.  We need better dynamic range and noise control.  I have great 20 x 30 pics with a D70 at 6 megapixals.  A d400 also needs a dx sensor.  It is much cheaper to by wider lenses then it is to buy longer lenses.  Fx sensors have their place and market, but the dx sensor has it&#8217;s own place as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.K. WEERAWARDHANA</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-90494</link>
		<dc:creator>J.K. WEERAWARDHANA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-90494</guid>
		<description>How can I buy Nikon D400 digital camera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I buy Nikon D400 digital camera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-90115</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-90115</guid>
		<description>The DSLRs cycles is not going to be fix along all the century, that&#039;s is something we should have realized, so we shouldn&#039;t expect the cycles to repeat exactly the same.
It happens with almost every electronic device.

Besides that, I hope Nikon have learned about implementing a feature in a poor way. I&#039;m refering to the Movie mode.
D90&#039;s poor quality and 5D MK II lack of manual settings.
Both suffered for lot of complains that manufacturers should have thought before. Specially Canon, wich put a better quality, but didn&#039;t allow the user to set the controls.

Regarding D400, Nikon should improve the resolution, keep the good features of D300, and include a Full HD Movie mode, with GOOD compression codec and format, at a good bitrate and frame rate, and obviously, with FULL MANUAL settings !!

The D300 was a success, and the D400 could be another one if Nikon do the job correctly.

Probably seen in Feb-March 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DSLRs cycles is not going to be fix along all the century, that&#8217;s is something we should have realized, so we shouldn&#8217;t expect the cycles to repeat exactly the same.<br />
It happens with almost every electronic device.</p>
<p>Besides that, I hope Nikon have learned about implementing a feature in a poor way. I&#8217;m refering to the Movie mode.<br />
D90&#8217;s poor quality and 5D MK II lack of manual settings.<br />
Both suffered for lot of complains that manufacturers should have thought before. Specially Canon, wich put a better quality, but didn&#8217;t allow the user to set the controls.</p>
<p>Regarding D400, Nikon should improve the resolution, keep the good features of D300, and include a Full HD Movie mode, with GOOD compression codec and format, at a good bitrate and frame rate, and obviously, with FULL MANUAL settings !!</p>
<p>The D300 was a success, and the D400 could be another one if Nikon do the job correctly.</p>
<p>Probably seen in Feb-March 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyniek</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-83943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyniek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-83943</guid>
		<description>Noooo yet that &lt;em&gt;[edit]&lt;/em&gt; mpix! I&#039;d rather have Camera with not more than 12Mpix but with ultra-low-noise and great dynamic range rather than another &lt;em&gt;[edit]&lt;/em&gt; 16mpix matrice :/

&lt;em&gt;[Ed. - Try to keep comments family friendly please.]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo yet that <em>[edit]</em> mpix! I&#8217;d rather have Camera with not more than 12Mpix but with ultra-low-noise and great dynamic range rather than another <em>[edit]</em> 16mpix matrice :/</p>
<p><em>[Ed. - Try to keep comments family friendly please.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-54850</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-54850</guid>
		<description>Remember:

D200 was announced Nov. 2005
D300 was announced August 2007
D400 in December 2008? --&gt; Sorry, but not very probable

Instead there will be a FF high-MP D3x (or whatever it is called)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember:</p>
<p>D200 was announced Nov. 2005<br />
D300 was announced August 2007<br />
D400 in December 2008? &#8211;&gt; Sorry, but not very probable</p>
<p>Instead there will be a FF high-MP D3x (or whatever it is called)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon sta per lanciare la concorrente della EOS 5D Mark II? - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-54265</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon sta per lanciare la concorrente della EOS 5D Mark II? - Gizmodo IT - Il gadget weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-54265</guid>
		<description>[...] vi ha fatto battere il cuore e suscitato qualche tremolio allo stomaco, date un&#8217;occhiata a Photography Bay per leggere tutte le indiscrezioni sulla Nikon [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vi ha fatto battere il cuore e suscitato qualche tremolio allo stomaco, date un&#8217;occhiata a Photography Bay per leggere tutte le indiscrezioni sulla Nikon [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-54108</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 02:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-54108</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be likely to believe it if not for the fact that Nikon&#039;s been making a huge buzz about their upcoming &quot;Big&quot; announcement, expected in February during WPPI. It doesn&#039;t seem like it&#039;d be a smart move to have a major announcement in December, only to trump it two months later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be likely to believe it if not for the fact that Nikon&#8217;s been making a huge buzz about their upcoming &#8220;Big&#8221; announcement, expected in February during WPPI. It doesn&#8217;t seem like it&#8217;d be a smart move to have a major announcement in December, only to trump it two months later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
