<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D400</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonamouse</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-213926</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonamouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 21:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-213926</guid>
		<description>hehe, aren&#039;t rumours funny. 2 years. At least 2 years wrong.

I&#039;d probably buy the D400 (when it arrives). If only I could afforded it. Rumours are it&#039;ll have the 24MP APS-C sensor made by Sony. But that&#039;s just a rumour - hehe. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe, aren&#8217;t rumours funny. 2 years. At least 2 years wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d probably buy the D400 (when it arrives). If only I could afforded it. Rumours are it&#8217;ll have the 24MP APS-C sensor made by Sony. But that&#8217;s just a rumour &#8211; hehe. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-194158</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-194158</guid>
		<description>Still waiting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still waiting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nope</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-184930</link>
		<dc:creator>Nope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-184930</guid>
		<description>Just a heads up...the thread on dpreview that you cite &quot;jeff-c&quot; talking about a new sony sensor is from november 2008. There are much more recent threads on DPR with speculations about the D400...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a heads up&#8230;the thread on dpreview that you cite &#8220;jeff-c&#8221; talking about a new sony sensor is from november 2008. There are much more recent threads on DPR with speculations about the D400&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Au</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-175428</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Au</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-175428</guid>
		<description>I am think Nikon will not announce the D400 &amp; the D800 this year (2009). They may have problem to make it happen - better than the Canon&#039;s. So I am considering to turn to Canon (within the next month or shorter). Everyone are welcome to join me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am think Nikon will not announce the D400 &amp; the D800 this year (2009). They may have problem to make it happen &#8211; better than the Canon&#8217;s. So I am considering to turn to Canon (within the next month or shorter). Everyone are welcome to join me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mzaidi.com</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-174678</link>
		<dc:creator>mzaidi.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-174678</guid>
		<description>I want... i want...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want&#8230; i want&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAGATH</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-142155</link>
		<dc:creator>JAGATH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-142155</guid>
		<description>I want buy a D400 camera. How can I buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want buy a D400 camera. How can I buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-91530</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-91530</guid>
		<description>Amen to the Kyniek comment!!!  We do not need more megapixals.  We need better dynamic range and noise control.  I have great 20 x 30 pics with a D70 at 6 megapixals.  A d400 also needs a dx sensor.  It is much cheaper to by wider lenses then it is to buy longer lenses.  Fx sensors have their place and market, but the dx sensor has it&#039;s own place as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to the Kyniek comment!!!  We do not need more megapixals.  We need better dynamic range and noise control.  I have great 20 x 30 pics with a D70 at 6 megapixals.  A d400 also needs a dx sensor.  It is much cheaper to by wider lenses then it is to buy longer lenses.  Fx sensors have their place and market, but the dx sensor has it&#8217;s own place as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.K. WEERAWARDHANA</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-90494</link>
		<dc:creator>J.K. WEERAWARDHANA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-90494</guid>
		<description>How can I buy Nikon D400 digital camera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I buy Nikon D400 digital camera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablov</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-90115</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-90115</guid>
		<description>The DSLRs cycles is not going to be fix along all the century, that&#039;s is something we should have realized, so we shouldn&#039;t expect the cycles to repeat exactly the same.
It happens with almost every electronic device.

Besides that, I hope Nikon have learned about implementing a feature in a poor way. I&#039;m refering to the Movie mode.
D90&#039;s poor quality and 5D MK II lack of manual settings.
Both suffered for lot of complains that manufacturers should have thought before. Specially Canon, wich put a better quality, but didn&#039;t allow the user to set the controls.

Regarding D400, Nikon should improve the resolution, keep the good features of D300, and include a Full HD Movie mode, with GOOD compression codec and format, at a good bitrate and frame rate, and obviously, with FULL MANUAL settings !!

The D300 was a success, and the D400 could be another one if Nikon do the job correctly.

Probably seen in Feb-March 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DSLRs cycles is not going to be fix along all the century, that&#8217;s is something we should have realized, so we shouldn&#8217;t expect the cycles to repeat exactly the same.<br />
It happens with almost every electronic device.</p>
<p>Besides that, I hope Nikon have learned about implementing a feature in a poor way. I&#8217;m refering to the Movie mode.<br />
D90&#8242;s poor quality and 5D MK II lack of manual settings.<br />
Both suffered for lot of complains that manufacturers should have thought before. Specially Canon, wich put a better quality, but didn&#8217;t allow the user to set the controls.</p>
<p>Regarding D400, Nikon should improve the resolution, keep the good features of D300, and include a Full HD Movie mode, with GOOD compression codec and format, at a good bitrate and frame rate, and obviously, with FULL MANUAL settings !!</p>
<p>The D300 was a success, and the D400 could be another one if Nikon do the job correctly.</p>
<p>Probably seen in Feb-March 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyniek</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/23/nikon-d400/#comment-83943</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyniek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3389#comment-83943</guid>
		<description>Noooo yet that &lt;em&gt;[edit]&lt;/em&gt; mpix! I&#039;d rather have Camera with not more than 12Mpix but with ultra-low-noise and great dynamic range rather than another &lt;em&gt;[edit]&lt;/em&gt; 16mpix matrice :/

&lt;em&gt;[Ed. - Try to keep comments family friendly please.]&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo yet that <em>[edit]</em> mpix! I&#8217;d rather have Camera with not more than 12Mpix but with ultra-low-noise and great dynamic range rather than another <em>[edit]</em> 16mpix matrice :/</p>
<p><em>[Ed. - Try to keep comments family friendly please.]</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-09 19:41:57 -->
