<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Cameras That Don&#8217;t Live Up to Their Hype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-51582</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-51582</guid>
		<description>Do you want to film, bay a film camera. Not a Nikon D90 camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you want to film, bay a film camera. Not a Nikon D90 camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-51136</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-51136</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more about the Nikon P6000. I&#039;m a big fan of Nikon and use their DSLR but the P6000 was a big disapointment. One should mention that the GPS-tagging ist almost worthless as it is very unpractical to use and the antenna is really bad.

I&#039;m fortunate to have a good relation with my camera gear supplier so after using the P6000 for two weeks I got to return it and got an Canon G10 instead. Love it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more about the Nikon P6000. I&#8217;m a big fan of Nikon and use their DSLR but the P6000 was a big disapointment. One should mention that the GPS-tagging ist almost worthless as it is very unpractical to use and the antenna is really bad.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fortunate to have a good relation with my camera gear supplier so after using the P6000 for two weeks I got to return it and got an Canon G10 instead. Love it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-50828</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 04:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-50828</guid>
		<description>&gt; &quot;Anyone that’s tried to film with the D90...&quot;

Uh, the D90 is a digital camera, not a film camera. How do you film things with a digital camera? Film is that light sensitive flexible stuff that comes in rolls and needs to be chemically developed. You shine light through it to see it. It&#039;s pretty cool. You should check it out some time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; &#8220;Anyone that’s tried to film with the D90&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Uh, the D90 is a digital camera, not a film camera. How do you film things with a digital camera? Film is that light sensitive flexible stuff that comes in rolls and needs to be chemically developed. You shine light through it to see it. It&#8217;s pretty cool. You should check it out some time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimPea</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-50787</link>
		<dc:creator>JimPea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-50787</guid>
		<description>I agree with the Nikon Coolpix P6000 being on the list. However, you failed to mention their proprietary RAW format based on Microsoft technology and that it would not work on a Mac. Stupid. Glad to see that the image quality sucks, maybe they will be make a better decision on the next version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the Nikon Coolpix P6000 being on the list. However, you failed to mention their proprietary RAW format based on Microsoft technology and that it would not work on a Mac. Stupid. Glad to see that the image quality sucks, maybe they will be make a better decision on the next version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapixelicio.us</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-50665</link>
		<dc:creator>megapixelicio.us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-50665</guid>
		<description>Arent Reds video camera that can take stills? Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arent Reds video camera that can take stills? Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; 5 seriously overhyped digital cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-50580</link>
		<dc:creator>CrunchGear &#187; Archive &#187; 5 seriously overhyped digital cameras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-50580</guid>
		<description>[...] a big fan of the Casio EX-F1 and wrote at length last week on how major the RED announcement was, I can&#8217;t disagree with this list. The D90 hasn&#8217;t lived up to its hype, the 1D Mk III does have serious problems, the Scarlet is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a big fan of the Casio EX-F1 and wrote at length last week on how major the RED announcement was, I can&#8217;t disagree with this list. The D90 hasn&#8217;t lived up to its hype, the 1D Mk III does have serious problems, the Scarlet is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonorman</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/11/17/5-cameras-that-dont-live-up-to-their-hype/#comment-50417</link>
		<dc:creator>sonorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=3288#comment-50417</guid>
		<description>Mentioning the 1D Mark III in this list is probably not really fair. Sure, the Camera has had it&#039;s problems. Therefore it&#039;s definitely not Canon&#039;s most glorious hour, but in the meantime the camera ist a stellar performer and has outperformed Nikons D3 (the one with the glorious aura) in more than one AF performance tests. Here is just one:
http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/pro-photo-reviews-articles/76674-canon-canon-1d-camera-canon-mkiii-camera-vs-nikon-nikon-d3-camera-sports-autofocus-showdown.html

In my opinion, number 3 on the list belongs to the Olympus E-3. The Camera is expensive, heavy, bulky and can&#039;t compete with much cheaper APS-C Cameras in image quality, nor in many other areas. It&#039;s the worst example for the &quot;compact&quot; Four Thirds system and far from being an alternative for professionals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mentioning the 1D Mark III in this list is probably not really fair. Sure, the Camera has had it&#8217;s problems. Therefore it&#8217;s definitely not Canon&#8217;s most glorious hour, but in the meantime the camera ist a stellar performer and has outperformed Nikons D3 (the one with the glorious aura) in more than one AF performance tests. Here is just one:<br />
<a href="http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/pro-photo-reviews-articles/76674-canon-canon-1d-camera-canon-mkiii-camera-vs-nikon-nikon-d3-camera-sports-autofocus-showdown.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.prophotohome.com/forum/pro-photo-reviews-articles/76674-canon-canon-1d-camera-canon-mkiii-camera-vs-nikon-nikon-d3-camera-sports-autofocus-showdown.html</a></p>
<p>In my opinion, number 3 on the list belongs to the Olympus E-3. The Camera is expensive, heavy, bulky and can&#8217;t compete with much cheaper APS-C Cameras in image quality, nor in many other areas. It&#8217;s the worst example for the &#8220;compact&#8221; Four Thirds system and far from being an alternative for professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
