<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon MX Format</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:53:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david weaver</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-53384</link>
		<dc:creator>david weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-53384</guid>
		<description>If there is a new product line from Nikon and they are going for medium format then that is great.   Ir will finally put some competition into the digital medium format market.
If you can use some existing Nikkon-mount lenses then you will stay loyal to the brand.
Nikon will sell more glass specifically for the MX format.
Nikon will sell a ton of these cameras.

A turf war will start between MX users and Mamiya , Hasselblad users.   I can see it now.  All the arguments how something is better than the other.  I can see H-blad users marketing that they use H-blads...  hahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a new product line from Nikon and they are going for medium format then that is great.   Ir will finally put some competition into the digital medium format market.<br />
If you can use some existing Nikkon-mount lenses then you will stay loyal to the brand.<br />
Nikon will sell more glass specifically for the MX format.<br />
Nikon will sell a ton of these cameras.</p>
<p>A turf war will start between MX users and Mamiya , Hasselblad users.   I can see it now.  All the arguments how something is better than the other.  I can see H-blad users marketing that they use H-blads&#8230;  hahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jose luis</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-33628</link>
		<dc:creator>jose luis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-33628</guid>
		<description>personaly, I don&#039;t agree with saiminyko.
on this very competitive market, you have to follow the new end.
even leica, on the few past years have launch too many models on a target we never think they will involved.
the things here are about to survive on a truely much competitive market.
look on d-lux and digilux and the other consumer ranges from other companies.
the company called &quot;mr patent maker&quot; (my way to see konica minolta) was gone. and think about they contribution. even as leica&#039;s suppliers (thought, don&#039;t sure)

on the past, you have 3 big considerations to make in terms of capture: a body, lenses, and film. today you need to change the bodies.

the way of companies will be conservative it&#039;s a matter of time. it&#039;s a kind of &quot;moral thing&quot; (personal thought, obviously)

b.regards,
jose luis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personaly, I don&#8217;t agree with saiminyko.<br />
on this very competitive market, you have to follow the new end.<br />
even leica, on the few past years have launch too many models on a target we never think they will involved.<br />
the things here are about to survive on a truely much competitive market.<br />
look on d-lux and digilux and the other consumer ranges from other companies.<br />
the company called &#8220;mr patent maker&#8221; (my way to see konica minolta) was gone. and think about they contribution. even as leica&#8217;s suppliers (thought, don&#8217;t sure)</p>
<p>on the past, you have 3 big considerations to make in terms of capture: a body, lenses, and film. today you need to change the bodies.</p>
<p>the way of companies will be conservative it&#8217;s a matter of time. it&#8217;s a kind of &#8220;moral thing&#8221; (personal thought, obviously)</p>
<p>b.regards,<br />
jose luis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-29622</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-29622</guid>
		<description>following the rumor mill is exasperating. I am pretty easy to please; I want something from Nikon that will compete and compare favorably to the Canon 5D Mark ll, other than the D700 in terms of megapixels. Is that too much to hope for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>following the rumor mill is exasperating. I am pretty easy to please; I want something from Nikon that will compete and compare favorably to the Canon 5D Mark ll, other than the D700 in terms of megapixels. Is that too much to hope for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randolph Ormbsy</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-23491</link>
		<dc:creator>Randolph Ormbsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 04:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-23491</guid>
		<description>40mp would almost = MF which has a res = to 50. 4x5 = 125. I say a 28-36mp body with interchangeable backs. May be square who knows. Itz coming trust me said the ostrich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>40mp would almost = MF which has a res = to 50. 4&#215;5 = 125. I say a 28-36mp body with interchangeable backs. May be square who knows. Itz coming trust me said the ostrich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Fillmer</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-23098</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Fillmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-23098</guid>
		<description>will photokina just get here already... so many rumors about what Nikon is going to release it&#039;s just crazy right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>will photokina just get here already&#8230; so many rumors about what Nikon is going to release it&#8217;s just crazy right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-21430</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-21430</guid>
		<description>I want an enormous friggin&#039; sensor...something similar in size to the film that Ansel Adams was using...

No less than 450mp, live-view, HD movie, built-in picture taker. Ya know, when you&#039;re looking one way but the action is somewhere else...the camera will spin yer sorry butt around and just take the pic for ya!! - then you can show all your friends what a friggin&#039; genius you are. Just hope no one asks you what an f-stop is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want an enormous friggin&#8217; sensor&#8230;something similar in size to the film that Ansel Adams was using&#8230;</p>
<p>No less than 450mp, live-view, HD movie, built-in picture taker. Ya know, when you&#8217;re looking one way but the action is somewhere else&#8230;the camera will spin yer sorry butt around and just take the pic for ya!! &#8211; then you can show all your friends what a friggin&#8217; genius you are. Just hope no one asks you what an f-stop is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saiminyaku</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-21338</link>
		<dc:creator>saiminyaku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-21338</guid>
		<description>the Otoji spy shot is a fake.  the right page is clearly not even from the same manifest as the super-imposed left.  the right page speaks of being frugal with grocercies and things of the food nature whereas the other side could&#039;ve easily been made by anyone.  in addition, these given specs do not match the current rumored 48x48 by any means.

still crossing my fingers that this thing will be at least three times cheaper than other high-end rangefinders.

i think someone should start digging Canon&#039;s grave for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Otoji spy shot is a fake.  the right page is clearly not even from the same manifest as the super-imposed left.  the right page speaks of being frugal with grocercies and things of the food nature whereas the other side could&#8217;ve easily been made by anyone.  in addition, these given specs do not match the current rumored 48&#215;48 by any means.</p>
<p>still crossing my fingers that this thing will be at least three times cheaper than other high-end rangefinders.</p>
<p>i think someone should start digging Canon&#8217;s grave for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jenrette</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-21305</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jenrette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-21305</guid>
		<description>Although it makes some sense that too new  cameras should make photographers hesitant about buying the new and dumping the old, the reality seems to be that we are all too anxiuous to grab the new -- even when the new is only marginally better than the &quot;old&quot;. On the other hand, if photographers (pro and am) didn&#039;t grab for the new, then fewer models would come out in smaller quantities and the prices would be that much higher and the products less innovative (Consider the Leica line of photo equipment -- which once was the gold standard for 35mm photographers but which is now priced beyond most means and with less features. Since 1954, there have been 8 M models -- how many Nikon SLR&#039;s have there been in less time: F, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, Nikkorman FT, FTn, FM, FM2, FM2n, N2000, N2020, FE, FA, D1, D2H, D2Hs, D2x, D2Xs, 4004, 5005, 8008, D100, D40, D40x, D50, D60, D80, D90, D200, D300, D700 --- and I bet I left out some! Not even mentioning all the coolpix varieties).  I guess we buy them as fast as they come out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although it makes some sense that too new  cameras should make photographers hesitant about buying the new and dumping the old, the reality seems to be that we are all too anxiuous to grab the new &#8212; even when the new is only marginally better than the &#8220;old&#8221;. On the other hand, if photographers (pro and am) didn&#8217;t grab for the new, then fewer models would come out in smaller quantities and the prices would be that much higher and the products less innovative (Consider the Leica line of photo equipment &#8212; which once was the gold standard for 35mm photographers but which is now priced beyond most means and with less features. Since 1954, there have been 8 M models &#8212; how many Nikon SLR&#8217;s have there been in less time: F, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, Nikkorman FT, FTn, FM, FM2, FM2n, N2000, N2020, FE, FA, D1, D2H, D2Hs, D2x, D2Xs, 4004, 5005, 8008, D100, D40, D40x, D50, D60, D80, D90, D200, D300, D700 &#8212; and I bet I left out some! Not even mentioning all the coolpix varieties).  I guess we buy them as fast as they come out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-21268</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-21268</guid>
		<description>Camera&#039;s are becoming more and more like computers/computer components with something &#039;new just around the corner&#039;.  It won&#039;t stop people from buying/upgrading.  Just means you have many more options and things to consider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camera&#8217;s are becoming more and more like computers/computer components with something &#8216;new just around the corner&#8217;.  It won&#8217;t stop people from buying/upgrading.  Just means you have many more options and things to consider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poagao</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/09/04/nikon-mx-format/#comment-21227</link>
		<dc:creator>Poagao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=2223#comment-21227</guid>
		<description>Great, another camera &quot;just around the corner&quot; that will theoretically make all other cameras obsolete. If this keeps up nobody will ever buy anything ever again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, another camera &#8220;just around the corner&#8221; that will theoretically make all other cameras obsolete. If this keeps up nobody will ever buy anything ever again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-09 17:45:38 -->
