Nikon D90 Confirmed, Priced at $1299.95 With 18-105mm VR Kit Lens

Written by Eric on August 11th, 2008 | 1 Comment


Nikon Rumors received a tip from a reader that Circuit City already has the Nikon D90 listed in its inventory system.  The tipsters stated the following:

I have some D90 info. I work for Circuit City. While checking our DSLR inventory I noticed that the Nikon D90 with an 18-105mm VR lens was listed as an active SKU in our system. The price came up at $1299.99. I started a ticket and it was actually letting me special order the camera. The Web ID for the camera is NIK D90KIT18105VR. I don’t know if this will stay in the system but anyone should be able to special order a D90 from a Circuit City store using that SKU if it doesn’t change.

For the latest news and rumors on the Nikon D90, stay tuned to Photography Bay’s Nikon D90 page.



One Response to “Nikon D90 Confirmed, Priced at $1299.95 With 18-105mm VR Kit Lens”

  1. Nikon D90 gets more official | neutralday

    [...] Photography Bay, via Nikonrumors. I have some D90 info. I work for Circuit City. While checking our DSLR inventory [...]

Leave a Reply



Your Email:




Recent Comments:

  • Richard Eng: I agree with Paul 100%. In March of this year, I chose the 40D over the 50D, precisely because going to 15 mp on a APS-C...
  • Richard Eng: The BG-E2N is the ugliest piece of accessory I’ve seen from Canon. I know, I know, you’re not supposed to care...
  • John: Thanks for this: pretty much have been doing it this way with great results. The zoom in zoom out for focus though is a new tip i...
  • redhand1873: Hey guys some nice shoots here is some of my photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/r edhand1873/ P.s Chris i have added you as...
  • Wiwik: Justin, it’s an amazing shot!!
  • Clement: Waw, that’s an amazing one ! No post treatment ?
  • Justin Fritts: Thought I’d throw mine in here too. I definitely required a tripod with mine however. The light was so low that I...
  • David: Chris, I see what you’re saying - you’re exposing for the shadows in this case. The way I read it you were saying that...