<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D900</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-177453</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 15:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-177453</guid>
		<description>I have been waiting for a year now for Nikon to compete with Sony &amp; Canon in the $3,000.00 price range. Here is Nikons price range right now, $1,500.00 and below &amp; $6,000.00 and above. I have been holding out &amp; waiting for Nikon to offer a 20+ mp and FX in the $3,000.00 price range, and please no Video...while I know some people want that...they offer plenty of models now under $1500.00 with Video. I am a Photographer and I would rather see extra Photography fetures on my camera then have Video. I am buying a new Camera in the Spring of 2010 and I want to stick with Nikon, but if they don&#039;t come out with a camera to compete with Sony or Canon in the $3,000.00 price range then I will have to leave the Nikon family and move to Canon or Sony.....but I really want to stick in the Nikon family...so please Nikon....make the D900...please, please, please...I have been waiting a year already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been waiting for a year now for Nikon to compete with Sony &amp; Canon in the $3,000.00 price range. Here is Nikons price range right now, $1,500.00 and below &amp; $6,000.00 and above. I have been holding out &amp; waiting for Nikon to offer a 20+ mp and FX in the $3,000.00 price range, and please no Video&#8230;while I know some people want that&#8230;they offer plenty of models now under $1500.00 with Video. I am a Photographer and I would rather see extra Photography fetures on my camera then have Video. I am buying a new Camera in the Spring of 2010 and I want to stick with Nikon, but if they don&#8217;t come out with a camera to compete with Sony or Canon in the $3,000.00 price range then I will have to leave the Nikon family and move to Canon or Sony&#8230;..but I really want to stick in the Nikon family&#8230;so please Nikon&#8230;.make the D900&#8230;please, please, please&#8230;I have been waiting a year already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manfred Sauer-Nideggen</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-90763</link>
		<dc:creator>Manfred Sauer-Nideggen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-90763</guid>
		<description>I fully agree from a marketing-related point of view as well as a user that a semi-professional SLR with 21-24 MB is needed. 
Parameters are changing because of economic crisis, ongoing chip-evolution and new competition like Sony&#039;s Alpha 900. 
As a Nikon consumer for over 25 years, I had been waiting for the D3 but was quite disappointed because of its poor resolution. Now I am disppointed again because of the target pricing for the new D3x. 
I am not sure if I could wait another year for a D900 or whatsoever because there exists already an alternative: Canon 5D II.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully agree from a marketing-related point of view as well as a user that a semi-professional SLR with 21-24 MB is needed.<br />
Parameters are changing because of economic crisis, ongoing chip-evolution and new competition like Sony&#8217;s Alpha 900.<br />
As a Nikon consumer for over 25 years, I had been waiting for the D3 but was quite disappointed because of its poor resolution. Now I am disppointed again because of the target pricing for the new D3x.<br />
I am not sure if I could wait another year for a D900 or whatsoever because there exists already an alternative: Canon 5D II.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-16752</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-16752</guid>
		<description>@someone - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/29/2008/07/22/2008/06/18/nikon-d700/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yep&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@someone &#8211; <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/29/2008/07/22/2008/06/18/nikon-d700/" rel="nofollow">Yep</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LAI Siu-kwong</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-16742</link>
		<dc:creator>LAI Siu-kwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-16742</guid>
		<description>there wouldn&#039;t be much improvement over D3 of D700 except 24m pixels with stronger (says quad) processors. Therefore Nikon would not rush to introduce it not until Sony or Canon have trigger the next competition over full frame sector.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there wouldn&#8217;t be much improvement over D3 of D700 except 24m pixels with stronger (says quad) processors. Therefore Nikon would not rush to introduce it not until Sony or Canon have trigger the next competition over full frame sector.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: someone</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-16453</link>
		<dc:creator>someone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-16453</guid>
		<description>Hope you guys know that the Nikon D700 was introduced back in July 1 2008 right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you guys know that the Nikon D700 was introduced back in July 1 2008 right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon working on D900? &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-16392</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon working on D900? &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-16392</guid>
		<description>[...] Photography Bay] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Nikon working on 25 megapixel D800?Closing price [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photography Bay] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Nikon working on 25 megapixel D800?Closing price [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/28/nikon-d900/#comment-16369</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1469#comment-16369</guid>
		<description>Nikon D900 will never complete SONY A900 &amp; Canon 5D MarkII,because it will be the highest price</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon D900 will never complete SONY A900 &amp; Canon 5D MarkII,because it will be the highest price</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
