<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon Rebel XSi Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wilba</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/#comment-132176</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 06:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=810#comment-132176</guid>
		<description>&quot;Unfortunately, the latter option [normal AF mode] is the fastest and most accurate method of autofocusing in Live View mode.&quot; The Phase-detection AF mode is certainly the fastest, but it&#039;s also the least accurate - contrast-detection AF always beats it for accuracy in good light, particularly when using the 5 or 10 times magnification function.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Unfortunately, the latter option [normal AF mode] is the fastest and most accurate method of autofocusing in Live View mode.&#8221; The Phase-detection AF mode is certainly the fastest, but it&#8217;s also the least accurate &#8211; contrast-detection AF always beats it for accuracy in good light, particularly when using the 5 or 10 times magnification function.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/#comment-16276</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=810#comment-16276</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great review.  I also am upgrading from a point and shoot, but occasionally still use film with an old SLR and scan it with a Coolscan V.  Although it would be a major improvement for Canon to overhaul the slower/outdated live view function, I am a little disappointed that they didn&#039;t take this opportunity to boost the ISO up to 3200 like Sony.  Overall, the XSi does appear to have a slight edge over Sony and Nikon.  This review helped confirm my choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great review.  I also am upgrading from a point and shoot, but occasionally still use film with an old SLR and scan it with a Coolscan V.  Although it would be a major improvement for Canon to overhaul the slower/outdated live view function, I am a little disappointed that they didn&#8217;t take this opportunity to boost the ISO up to 3200 like Sony.  Overall, the XSi does appear to have a slight edge over Sony and Nikon.  This review helped confirm my choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/#comment-14849</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=810#comment-14849</guid>
		<description>@Eric M. - That&#039;s a common point that many DSLR shoppers raise.  Sony, Olympus and Pentax make great cameras; however, Canon&#039;s lens selection is much larger - and you can get IS in just about any focal length that you&#039;re looking for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eric M. &#8211; That&#8217;s a common point that many DSLR shoppers raise.  Sony, Olympus and Pentax make great cameras; however, Canon&#8217;s lens selection is much larger &#8211; and you can get IS in just about any focal length that you&#8217;re looking for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric M.</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/07/06/canon-rebel-xsi-review/#comment-14842</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=810#comment-14842</guid>
		<description>Great review, I&#039;m looking to upgrade from a great point and shoot and the Rebel line has definitely captured (pun intended, lol) my eye. It just worries me that there isn&#039;t IS built into the body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, I&#8217;m looking to upgrade from a great point and shoot and the Rebel line has definitely captured (pun intended, lol) my eye. It just worries me that there isn&#8217;t IS built into the body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
