<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D700 Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/06/30/nikon-d700-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/06/30/nikon-d700-images/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: LAI Siu-kwong</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/06/30/nikon-d700-images/#comment-13891</link>
		<dc:creator>LAI Siu-kwong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1327#comment-13891</guid>
		<description>D700 is right combination for serious amateur. But its viewfinder magfi ratio is too low some 0.75, dispite eyepiece magfi is available. D3 &#039;s improve version shall have much higher pixels.  It is Nikon&#039;s strategy to launch a professional model and then a lower version for amateur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D700 is right combination for serious amateur. But its viewfinder magfi ratio is too low some 0.75, dispite eyepiece magfi is available. D3 &#8217;s improve version shall have much higher pixels.  It is Nikon&#8217;s strategy to launch a professional model and then a lower version for amateur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/06/30/nikon-d700-images/#comment-13785</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 06:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1327#comment-13785</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little confused by this one. It seems to more-or-less, &quot;sit&quot; right on the same specs as the D3 while having D300 features as well?

So does this spell the end of the D3 in favor of a D3X??? Depending on the price of it, it may also spell the demise of the D300 also</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little confused by this one. It seems to more-or-less, &#8220;sit&#8221; right on the same specs as the D3 while having D300 features as well?</p>
<p>So does this spell the end of the D3 in favor of a D3X??? Depending on the price of it, it may also spell the demise of the D300 also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
