<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mayur</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-18554</link>
		<dc:creator>mayur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-18554</guid>
		<description>I think it will be not nikon d10 but Nikon Fx 100--if not I request Nikon to continue their coming splendid Full Frame series With &#039;Fx&#039;--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it will be not nikon d10 but Nikon Fx 100&#8211;if not I request Nikon to continue their coming splendid Full Frame series With &#8216;Fx&#8217;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12786</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12786</guid>
		<description>Also a rumor. And also fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also a rumor. And also fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pyroclastique</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12704</link>
		<dc:creator>Pyroclastique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12704</guid>
		<description>Tis is a FAKE.
The new Nikon is D700
http://www.pixelistes.com/forum/nouveau-nikon-d700-full-frame-new-vt39663.html
;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tis is a FAKE.<br />
The new Nikon is D700<br />
<a href="http://www.pixelistes.com/forum/nouveau-nikon-d700-full-frame-new-vt39663.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pixelistes.com/forum/nouveau-nikon-d700-full-frame-new-vt39663.html</a><br />
;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12621</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12621</guid>
		<description>Eric:

The D3 were rumored to have a sensor covering 95% of fullframe. Not quite right and rather stupid in retrospect.

Of course, I can always start a rumor about Nikon eventually releasing a new DSLR and that it will be black. That doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric:</p>
<p>The D3 were rumored to have a sensor covering 95% of fullframe. Not quite right and rather stupid in retrospect.</p>
<p>Of course, I can always start a rumor about Nikon eventually releasing a new DSLR and that it will be black. That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12272</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12272</guid>
		<description>@AK - I believe there were several rumors about the Nikon D3 that turned out to be quite accurate.  Of course, they always get a little better as we get closer to launch, but it&#039;s kind of hard to determine when that is, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@AK &#8211; I believe there were several rumors about the Nikon D3 that turned out to be quite accurate.  Of course, they always get a little better as we get closer to launch, but it&#8217;s kind of hard to determine when that is, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AK</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12271</link>
		<dc:creator>AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12271</guid>
		<description>In the history of Life, the Universe and Everything NOT A SINGLE RUMOR about an upcoming Nikon camera have been correct.

So this is not &quot;good news&quot;, because it&#039;s not news at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the history of Life, the Universe and Everything NOT A SINGLE RUMOR about an upcoming Nikon camera have been correct.</p>
<p>So this is not &#8220;good news&#8221;, because it&#8217;s not news at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dap</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12259</link>
		<dc:creator>dap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12259</guid>
		<description>Nikon would not be shooting themselves in the foot at all.  The money would still be coming in the front door, just for a new camera.  Don&#039;t get model share confused with market share.  Nikon is in business to make money, not sell cameras.   

Seems only the consumer falls in love with a particular model not the manufacturer who is only looking for a way to get more money in the coffers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nikon would not be shooting themselves in the foot at all.  The money would still be coming in the front door, just for a new camera.  Don&#8217;t get model share confused with market share.  Nikon is in business to make money, not sell cameras.   </p>
<p>Seems only the consumer falls in love with a particular model not the manufacturer who is only looking for a way to get more money in the coffers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mircea</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12251</link>
		<dc:creator>Mircea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 12:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12251</guid>
		<description>A &#039;D10&#039; (FF D300-body) priced at around 3500$-4000$ would not kill either D3 or D300.
It would be nice to have it in the 2500$-3000$ range, but then again, dreaming is free :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A &#8216;D10&#8242; (FF D300-body) priced at around 3500$-4000$ would not kill either D3 or D300.<br />
It would be nice to have it in the 2500$-3000$ range, but then again, dreaming is free :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Sattler</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12229</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Sattler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12229</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I don&#039;t buy it - at least not at this time.

Nikon would shoot themselves in the foot by releasing a camera like this - the D300 is simply too new. If it was placed &quot;a spot above the D300&quot;, it would kill the D300 AND the D3 stone dead - sales of the D300 would die because you&#039;d get a FX sensor for litle more money, and nobody in their right mind would buy a D3 if they could get a FX sensor for that little money. It simply doesn&#039;t make sense to me.

Also, to quote: &quot;imagine if a D10 had the D300-type body with the D3 sensor&quot;. Well, what you just imagined was a D3 with a removable vertical grip.

f.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I don&#8217;t buy it &#8211; at least not at this time.</p>
<p>Nikon would shoot themselves in the foot by releasing a camera like this &#8211; the D300 is simply too new. If it was placed &#8220;a spot above the D300&#8243;, it would kill the D300 AND the D3 stone dead &#8211; sales of the D300 would die because you&#8217;d get a FX sensor for litle more money, and nobody in their right mind would buy a D3 if they could get a FX sensor for that little money. It simply doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>Also, to quote: &#8220;imagine if a D10 had the D300-type body with the D3 sensor&#8221;. Well, what you just imagined was a D3 with a removable vertical grip.</p>
<p>f.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pic of Nikon D10? &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/nikon-d10/#comment-12223</link>
		<dc:creator>Pic of Nikon D10? &#171; Dan&#8217;s Tech-n-Stuff Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1102#comment-12223</guid>
		<description>[...] [Via Photography Bay] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Via Photography Bay] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
