<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture Plug-Ins: Nik Viveza in the Wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/aperture-plug-ins-nik-viveza-in-the-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/aperture-plug-ins-nik-viveza-in-the-wild/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:44:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/aperture-plug-ins-nik-viveza-in-the-wild/#comment-10585</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1109#comment-10585</guid>
		<description>@kremalicious - That&#039;s a good point you make regarding the psd files.  I&#039;m a Lightroom user, so I&#039;m not too familiar with Aperture&#039;s file architecture.  It makes sense though.  

Thanks for sharing your link.  That&#039;s a solid resource for Aperture plugins.  The noise ninja plugin looks very promising.  Perhaps I should consider adding Aperture to my arsenal?  Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kremalicious &#8211; That&#8217;s a good point you make regarding the psd files.  I&#8217;m a Lightroom user, so I&#8217;m not too familiar with Aperture&#8217;s file architecture.  It makes sense though.  </p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your link.  That&#8217;s a solid resource for Aperture plugins.  The noise ninja plugin looks very promising.  Perhaps I should consider adding Aperture to my arsenal?  Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kremalicious</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/05/07/aperture-plug-ins-nik-viveza-in-the-wild/#comment-10580</link>
		<dc:creator>kremalicious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/?p=1109#comment-10580</guid>
		<description>just to add: the aperture 2.1 plugin architecture always generates a psd file from the version image and handles all plugin adjustments on that file. so in fact we aren&#039;t working directly on our RAW-files when using the various editing plugins. All image editing within the plugins is destructive.
maybe you&#039;re interested in my overview article about the other 10 plugins. some of them are already available too and were released before Viveza:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kremalicious.com/2008/05/first-aperture-adjustment-plugins-have-arrived/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;First overview: Aperture 2.1 adjustment plugins have arrived&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just to add: the aperture 2.1 plugin architecture always generates a psd file from the version image and handles all plugin adjustments on that file. so in fact we aren&#8217;t working directly on our RAW-files when using the various editing plugins. All image editing within the plugins is destructive.<br />
maybe you&#8217;re interested in my overview article about the other 10 plugins. some of them are already available too and were released before Viveza:<br />
<a href="http://www.kremalicious.com/2008/05/first-aperture-adjustment-plugins-have-arrived/" rel="nofollow">First overview: Aperture 2.1 adjustment plugins have arrived</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
