<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony A350 Sample Images</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/#comment-8573</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/#comment-8573</guid>
		<description>Pat - Thanks for the comment.  I was actually referring to the exposure and dynamic range in the quote you reference.  Sorry if I didn&#039;t make that clear.

Regardless, I wholeheartedly agree with your observation regarding noise; however, given the target audience, I expect ISO 1600 and 3200 images will work just fine in 4x6 prints.  Unfortunately, megapixel headlines drive DSLR sales, especially in the consumer entry-level market.  That said, I&#039;m curious to see how the A300&#039;s 10MPs stack up in terms of noise against the A350.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat &#8211; Thanks for the comment.  I was actually referring to the exposure and dynamic range in the quote you reference.  Sorry if I didn&#8217;t make that clear.</p>
<p>Regardless, I wholeheartedly agree with your observation regarding noise; however, given the target audience, I expect ISO 1600 and 3200 images will work just fine in 4&#215;6 prints.  Unfortunately, megapixel headlines drive DSLR sales, especially in the consumer entry-level market.  That said, I&#8217;m curious to see how the A300&#8217;s 10MPs stack up in terms of noise against the A350.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat McGee</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/#comment-8570</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2008/03/15/sony-a350-sample-images/#comment-8570</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was pretty satisfied with what I got out of in-camera JPEGs from the Sony A350.&quot;

ISO 1600 has terrible noise in the shadows. That&#039;s the result of going back to a CCD sensor. It&#039;s equivaent to what you see in a D80 or K10D, last-generation image quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was pretty satisfied with what I got out of in-camera JPEGs from the Sony A350.&#8221;</p>
<p>ISO 1600 has terrible noise in the shadows. That&#8217;s the result of going back to a CCD sensor. It&#8217;s equivaent to what you see in a D80 or K10D, last-generation image quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
