<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: DSLR Movie Mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:07:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob G</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/#comment-7902</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/#comment-7902</guid>
		<description>That is one HUGE CF Card (I thought the largest out is 32 GB, not 3200 GB)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is one HUGE CF Card (I thought the largest out is 32 GB, not 3200 GB)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/#comment-7901</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2008/02/24/poll-dslr-movie-mode/#comment-7901</guid>
		<description>Ok, i think this is a great idea, except for one thing. The movie mode must be at higher resolution than HD, as in it needs to use the whole sensor. 
The only problem is that RAW footage at 14bit X 20 Million Pixels x 24 f/s x 1 byte/8 bits = 840 000 000 bytes/s = 50 400 000 000 bytes/minute
= 3 024 000 000 000 bytes/hour
= 3 TERABYTES/HOUR

So it would have to be compressed, and then again, why would you want all that detail anyway

PS: in 10 years, 20 MP movies will probably be common place (movie cinemas use 4K (horizontal = 4000 pixels) which is 6 MP)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, i think this is a great idea, except for one thing. The movie mode must be at higher resolution than HD, as in it needs to use the whole sensor.<br />
The only problem is that RAW footage at 14bit X 20 Million Pixels x 24 f/s x 1 byte/8 bits = 840 000 000 bytes/s = 50 400 000 000 bytes/minute<br />
= 3 024 000 000 000 bytes/hour<br />
= 3 TERABYTES/HOUR</p>
<p>So it would have to be compressed, and then again, why would you want all that detail anyway</p>
<p>PS: in 10 years, 20 MP movies will probably be common place (movie cinemas use 4K (horizontal = 4000 pixels) which is 6 MP)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 7/13 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: www.photographybay.com @ 2012-02-09 22:47:45 -->
