<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D90 Reviews and Resources</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelvin</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-27183</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-27183</guid>
		<description>The D90 is exceptional. I have been shooting Nikons for a while and own quite a few bodies from D50 to D300. I recently purchased the D90 for its movie making capabilities, weight and compactness. I have done some test shots using various lenses (pro glass) and i can say that the image quality is excellent which was expected since it uses the same sensor as the D300. Can&#039;t really tell the difference in image quality compared to the D300.

The movie capabilities is quite impressive that i am launching a new website soon specifically for dslr movie makers to post their movies. (http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/)

Get the D90! It is a sweet camera...

http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/
http://www.silver24mm.com/
http://www.ikphotography.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The D90 is exceptional. I have been shooting Nikons for a while and own quite a few bodies from D50 to D300. I recently purchased the D90 for its movie making capabilities, weight and compactness. I have done some test shots using various lenses (pro glass) and i can say that the image quality is excellent which was expected since it uses the same sensor as the D300. Can&#8217;t really tell the difference in image quality compared to the D300.</p>
<p>The movie capabilities is quite impressive that i am launching a new website soon specifically for dslr movie makers to post their movies. (<a href="http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/</a>)</p>
<p>Get the D90! It is a sweet camera&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalslrfilms.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.silver24mm.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.silver24mm.com/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ikphotography.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ikphotography.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-22186</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-22186</guid>
		<description>I have studio tested the Nikon D-80 Image and the Nikon D-90 Image and look at the photos of each camera against th Nikon D-300:


D-90 at 100% is better colors than the D-300.  Only a bit!
The D-80 and D-90 look the Same up to 20x30&quot;.

Impossible to see any difference in 20x30&quot;

D-90 is slightly better than D-300 colors only very slight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have studio tested the Nikon D-80 Image and the Nikon D-90 Image and look at the photos of each camera against th Nikon D-300:</p>
<p>D-90 at 100% is better colors than the D-300.  Only a bit!<br />
The D-80 and D-90 look the Same up to 20&#215;30&#8243;.</p>
<p>Impossible to see any difference in 20&#215;30&#8243;</p>
<p>D-90 is slightly better than D-300 colors only very slight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AA Putri</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-21226</link>
		<dc:creator>AA Putri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-21226</guid>
		<description>Is Nikon D90 arrive in Asia especially in Indonesia, I really waiting their characteristic that i loved so much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Nikon D90 arrive in Asia especially in Indonesia, I really waiting their characteristic that i loved so much&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgb</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-20555</link>
		<dc:creator>tgb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 05:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-20555</guid>
		<description>Does it have a line-in mini-stereo jack for an external microphone? That&#039;s all I want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it have a line-in mini-stereo jack for an external microphone? That&#8217;s all I want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The brand spanking new Nikon D90 with super cool features! &#124; Nadlique's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19998</link>
		<dc:creator>The brand spanking new Nikon D90 with super cool features! &#124; Nadlique's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19998</guid>
		<description>[...] true folks. The Nikon D90 is here. It&#8217;s not available to the general public just yet, but indeed, the Nikon D90 is no longer a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] true folks. The Nikon D90 is here. It&#8217;s not available to the general public just yet, but indeed, the Nikon D90 is no longer a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19944</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19944</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don&#039;t see 2008 as good....&quot; Need glasses? :-)
Personally I find this year a good one being more than pleased with the D700 - but again: If yoy wait long enough, you may end up as king of Sweden...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t see 2008 as good&#8230;.&#8221; Need glasses? :-)<br />
Personally I find this year a good one being more than pleased with the D700 &#8211; but again: If yoy wait long enough, you may end up as king of Sweden&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon EN-EL11 Battery</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19660</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon EN-EL11 Battery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-19660</guid>
		<description>The Nikon D-90  is better than canon 50d ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nikon D-90  is better than canon 50d ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nikon D90 Early Pictures + Specs- Rumors and News - D3x, D700, D800, D400, Digital Rangefinder</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18490</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikon Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Nikon D90 Early Pictures + Specs- Rumors and News - D3x, D700, D800, D400, Digital Rangefinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18490</guid>
		<description>[...] Bay has a shot of a posssible Nikon D90. It looks good to me, but I&#8217;ve been fooled before- there are some really good PP guys out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bay has a shot of a posssible Nikon D90. It looks good to me, but I&#8217;ve been fooled before- there are some really good PP guys out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18477</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18477</guid>
		<description>My Nikon D70 recently gave up the ghost and I decided it was time to buy a new camera. Looking around at the Nikon line there is nothing equivalent in terms of features of the Canon 40D, at the same price point. The closest equivalent is the D300, but in Canada it works out to be around $800 more expensive! The D80 and D60 just don&#039;t cut it. I seriously want to stay with Nikon, but unless the D90 gets released soon and doesn&#039;t try competing with the 40D I might just switch to Canon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Nikon D70 recently gave up the ghost and I decided it was time to buy a new camera. Looking around at the Nikon line there is nothing equivalent in terms of features of the Canon 40D, at the same price point. The closest equivalent is the D300, but in Canada it works out to be around $800 more expensive! The D80 and D60 just don&#8217;t cut it. I seriously want to stay with Nikon, but unless the D90 gets released soon and doesn&#8217;t try competing with the 40D I might just switch to Canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Harper</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18043</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Harper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/12/22/nikon-d90/#comment-18043</guid>
		<description>If the D-90 Nikon can do Video or not is not of any real importance.  Nikon tends to be 1-2 years slow on updates.  The Canon D-450 Rebel has 12MP and is rumored to be as sharp as the Canon D-5.  If so?  Then the Canon D-450 Rebel is sharper than the Nikon D-3.

I must assume the Nikon D-90 is a real baby step by Nikon.  In 2010 we may see a new model that is better.  Since I have the Nikon D-80 and use Ultra Color I can get cleaner images than any other lab by using their hand done Color correction for 15 cents on the printable images.

Unless Nikon can produce a 16.7MP Image the 10MP image is outstanding.

The difference of 10-12MP is nearly ZIP!

I do not see 2008 or even 2010 as good model years for Nikon, perhaps I will hold off till 2012.

Every two (2) years Nikon comes out with a Pro-Consumer Camera.  In Wedding work you need the control program knob of the D-50 D-80.  The D-200 and the D-300 lack this option and are real slow in changing shooting conditions.  They are more of a Studio or one location camera not easy to jump from Outside to Reception.

Think hard before buying the Nikon D-90 camera.  It is going to be to close to the D-80 to make much of a real difference.

Doug Harper

www.DougHarperPhoto.com
www.ThePerfectWedding.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the D-90 Nikon can do Video or not is not of any real importance.  Nikon tends to be 1-2 years slow on updates.  The Canon D-450 Rebel has 12MP and is rumored to be as sharp as the Canon D-5.  If so?  Then the Canon D-450 Rebel is sharper than the Nikon D-3.</p>
<p>I must assume the Nikon D-90 is a real baby step by Nikon.  In 2010 we may see a new model that is better.  Since I have the Nikon D-80 and use Ultra Color I can get cleaner images than any other lab by using their hand done Color correction for 15 cents on the printable images.</p>
<p>Unless Nikon can produce a 16.7MP Image the 10MP image is outstanding.</p>
<p>The difference of 10-12MP is nearly ZIP!</p>
<p>I do not see 2008 or even 2010 as good model years for Nikon, perhaps I will hold off till 2012.</p>
<p>Every two (2) years Nikon comes out with a Pro-Consumer Camera.  In Wedding work you need the control program knob of the D-50 D-80.  The D-200 and the D-300 lack this option and are real slow in changing shooting conditions.  They are more of a Studio or one location camera not easy to jump from Outside to Reception.</p>
<p>Think hard before buying the Nikon D-90 camera.  It is going to be to close to the D-80 to make much of a real difference.</p>
<p>Doug Harper</p>
<p><a href="http://www.DougHarperPhoto.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.DougHarperPhoto.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ThePerfectWedding.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.ThePerfectWedding.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
