Scott Kelby’s Nikon D300 Review

Written by Eric Reagan on December 13th, 2007 | 0 Comments


Scott Kelby has posted his review of the Nikon D300 and really thinks that it kicks butt.

Nitpicking above aside, the D300 is a much better, more fully featured update to the D200 than I had ever imagined it would be. How much so? Well, needless to say, I’m selling my D200 (through the EquipmentLady.com), but I guess what I’m most shocked about is that I’m going to sell my Nikon D2Xs now, too.

Get more news and reviews for the Nikon D300 on this page.

[tags]nikon, d300, review[/tags]



You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

More from Eric Reagan

More from Gear

Discuss this post in the Forums
Click here to go to Photography Bay Forums.
Not a member yet? Join Now. It's free!

Leave a Reply


PMA 2010

    Subscribe

  • Photography Bay on Twitter




Recent Comments:

  • Adam Woodhouse: I want that 24/1.4 lens BAD …. but at that insane price point, I’m afraid it isn’t happening. :(
  • Philip Arthur: How these two lens compare to the 12-24mm 2.8G will be interesting to find out. They aren’t rivals but do overlap in...
  • Alan: Im not bothered either way Canon or Nikon I use both. Which system does the tester gravitate towards?
  • Justin: What do you think about the lack of optical/sensor image stabilization in the H90? Would this fact alone prompt an upgrade to the...
  • bov: thank you eric. this has been my thoughts exactly since i bought a D5000 and found out i could only use AF-S lenses. i like the...
  • Sky: “I understand that you needed to pull the AF motor out of these camera bodies in order to make them smaller. ”...
  • d700: nikon will not totally replace the d700 with d800 ,, d800 will the new model maybe. d700 still remain some feature that d800 dun...
  • Tob: Sure, it would be nice, but I believe that there are lenses in the line up, which would make even more sense. While a 50mm f/1.8...