<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1D Mark IIIn or IV Rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-173890</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-173890</guid>
		<description>Whatever spec arrives I am sure it will be very good but please Canon do not let a new camera down by including a tiltable screen that is just waiting to be snapped off !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever spec arrives I am sure it will be very good but please Canon do not let a new camera down by including a tiltable screen that is just waiting to be snapped off !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Seelig</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-121110</link>
		<dc:creator>David Seelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-121110</guid>
		<description>12 to 16 mp fine but I like the 1.26 crop as I shoot profootball and it means I do not need a 600mm lens. Maybe they could do nikons crop trick which would be fine but I doubt they would do that,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 to 16 mp fine but I like the 1.26 crop as I shoot profootball and it means I do not need a 600mm lens. Maybe they could do nikons crop trick which would be fine but I doubt they would do that,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knuckles</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-23927</link>
		<dc:creator>Knuckles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-23927</guid>
		<description>Is there any more banter on the 1d mark 111 n..... its just that Canon now have the 5d 11 selling at the same price as a body only Mark 111....... now that to me just ain&#039;t normal canon thinkin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any more banter on the 1d mark 111 n&#8230;.. its just that Canon now have the 5d 11 selling at the same price as a body only Mark 111&#8230;&#8230;. now that to me just ain&#8217;t normal canon thinkin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PBF Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-15294</link>
		<dc:creator>PBF Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-15294</guid>
		<description>Oh please, there&#039;s no way Canon is releasing a FF 1D MkIII-N.  I can see improving the focusing to bring it up to par with the 1Ds Mk III and adding in UDMA but is that worth replacing a camera they released last year?  What I&#039;d like to see is the high-res screen that Nikon is now using.  And seriously, HD Video?  Look at the XL series video cameras, they have f/1.6 lenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please, there&#8217;s no way Canon is releasing a FF 1D MkIII-N.  I can see improving the focusing to bring it up to par with the 1Ds Mk III and adding in UDMA but is that worth replacing a camera they released last year?  What I&#8217;d like to see is the high-res screen that Nikon is now using.  And seriously, HD Video?  Look at the XL series video cameras, they have f/1.6 lenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tickles</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-12531</link>
		<dc:creator>tickles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 19:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-12531</guid>
		<description>16mp full frame is too much. give me 12 full frame and that is the perfect sports camera right dur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16mp full frame is too much. give me 12 full frame and that is the perfect sports camera right dur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fotograf</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-8665</link>
		<dc:creator>Fotograf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/11/13/canon-1d-mark-iiin-or-iv-rumors/#comment-8665</guid>
		<description>That sounds really nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds really nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
