<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 1D Mark III Focusing Fix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/</link>
	<description>The latest in digital photography and camera reviews, news and rumors for Canon, Nikon, Sony, Olympus and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:38:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Nyugh</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-3266</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Nyugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 06:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-3266</guid>
		<description>I have yet to hear a positive resolution from all of this. I have 2 1DMarkII bodies  (that have always had focusing issues that nobody has resolved) and would love to update my system. It&#039;s looking more and more that the Nikon D3 is the logical next step. This of course is rotten for me with all my Canon gear. But if my clients are whats most important, than that I guess answers my question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have yet to hear a positive resolution from all of this. I have 2 1DMarkII bodies  (that have always had focusing issues that nobody has resolved) and would love to update my system. It&#8217;s looking more and more that the Nikon D3 is the logical next step. This of course is rotten for me with all my Canon gear. But if my clients are whats most important, than that I guess answers my question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon 1D Mark IIIn or IV Rumors &#124; Photography Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon 1D Mark IIIn or IV Rumors &#124; Photography Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>[...] With the recent hoopla over Nikon&#8217;s new D3 and with the Canon 1D Mark III autofocusing issues, it shouldn&#8217;t come as a huge surprise that Canon shooters are calling for an all-out replacement of the camera with a new iteration of the camera. Well, the rumors weren&#8217;t too far behind. That&#8217;s right, rumors of a 1D Mark IV or Mark IIIn have started to rear their ugly head. Here&#8217;s some of the rumored specs floating around the web: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With the recent hoopla over Nikon&#8217;s new D3 and with the Canon 1D Mark III autofocusing issues, it shouldn&#8217;t come as a huge surprise that Canon shooters are calling for an all-out replacement of the camera with a new iteration of the camera. Well, the rumors weren&#8217;t too far behind. That&#8217;s right, rumors of a 1D Mark IV or Mark IIIn have started to rear their ugly head. Here&#8217;s some of the rumored specs floating around the web: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon EOS 1D Mark III Reviews &#124; Photography Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2036</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon EOS 1D Mark III Reviews &#124; Photography Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2036</guid>
		<description>[...] Canon has identified and issued a formal statement as of November 1, 2007 regarding a focusing problem with the EOS 1D Mark III.  More information (including the affected serial numbers) on this page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Canon has identified and issued a formal statement as of November 1, 2007 regarding a focusing problem with the EOS 1D Mark III.  More information (including the affected serial numbers) on this page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canon Europe Issues Statement re: EOS 1D Mark III Focusing Fix &#124; Photography Bay</title>
		<link>http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2033</link>
		<dc:creator>Canon Europe Issues Statement re: EOS 1D Mark III Focusing Fix &#124; Photography Bay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photographybay.com/2007/10/18/canon-1d-mark-iii-focusing-fix/#comment-2033</guid>
		<description>[...] The information can be found in the FAQ section of the Canon Europe Self-Service site. More information on the history of this issue can be found on this page. The following information is from Canon Europe: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The information can be found in the FAQ section of the Canon Europe Self-Service site. More information on the history of this issue can be found on this page. The following information is from Canon Europe: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
