Scott Kelby’s New Book and a Can of Worms?

Written by Eric Reagan on October 9th, 2007 | 12 Comments


Scott Kelby’s 7 Point System for Adobe Photoshop CS3 is due to release on October 19th and sounds really promising. As you may know, I’ve previously raved about Kelby’s books. I expect no less of this one.

It is touted as “so revolutionary that he’s officially applied for a patent with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.” (Amazon description). Something inside is a bit unsettled by this fact though.

A patent for an invention is a grant of property rights by the U.S. Government through the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The patent grant excludes others from making, using, or selling the invention in the United States. (USPTO)

I am curious to see the scope of the patent that Mr. Kelby is seeking. The patent doesn’t appear to be published yet (let me know if you find a copy). If a patent issues, will readers be forbidden from discussing the techniques on forums, blogging about it, posting youtube videos of the system in action? Is there a license to use the patent included with the purchase of the book? What if I’ve got an 8th point that makes the system better? Can I use it without a royalty on the original patent? What is Adobe’s stance on this?

Perhaps I am overreacting? Please chime in with your thoughts on the matter.

[tags]photoshop, scott kelby, 7 point system, patent, rights[/tags]



12 Responses to “Scott Kelby’s New Book and a Can of Worms?”

  1. bailpaul

    I would have thought scott might have a lot of legal trouble trade marking a system that uses an adobe trademarked idea. I expect his strongest opposition may come from adobe. It would be like a race driver pateneting a system that uses ferrari. He has no legal right to ferrari in the first place.

  2. Tim Solley

    Perhaps a clever marketing tactic designed to make his 7 point process have even more credibility? After all, saying \"I have a revolutionary 7 point process\" doesn\'t quite sound as good as \"My new 7 point process is so revolutionary that I have a patent pending\". Especially true when you\'re trying to sell books about the process.

    Maybe he has no illusions about actually getting a patent, but instead is using it as a tool to sell books.

    Just a thought.

  3. Tim Solley

    Perhaps a clever marketing tactic designed to make his 7 point process have even more credibility? After all, saying “I have a revolutionary 7 point process” doesn’t quite sound as good as “My new 7 point process is so revolutionary that I have a patent pending”. Especially true when you’re trying to sell books about the process.

    Maybe he has no illusions about actually getting a patent, but instead is using it as a tool to sell books.

    Just a thought.

  4. Marina

    I imagine the patent isn\'t about using the 7-point system but about teaching Photoshop using the 7-point system. That way users won\'t be prevented from using the system, they will just be prevented from teaching others in that format.

  5. Marina

    I imagine the patent isn’t about using the 7-point system but about teaching Photoshop using the 7-point system. That way users won’t be prevented from using the system, they will just be prevented from teaching others in that format.

  6. DB

    I\'d guess this was just marketing. You can file for a patent for just about anything – it doesn\'t mean that a patent will be granted.

  7. DB

    I’d guess this was just marketing. You can file for a patent for just about anything – it doesn’t mean that a patent will be granted.

  8. Roger Bourland

    Does your new book provide help for Photoshop Elements users?

    Roger

  9. Eric

    Roger,

    I don\'t know that Scott keeps any eye on this site and I don\'t know the answer to your question; however, I would recommend <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&am...rel=\"nofollow\">The Photoshop Elements 5 Book for Digital Photographers</a>. The whole series is fantastic and if you\'ve got a different version of Elements, there\'s probably a book tailored to that specific version. Just make sure you get one authored by Kelby. He really is a fantastic author.

  10. Roger Bourland

    Does your new book provide help for Photoshop Elements users?

    Roger

  11. Eric

    Roger,

    I don’t know that Scott keeps any eye on this site and I don’t know the answer to your question; however, I would recommend The Photoshop Elements 5 Book for Digital Photographers. The whole series is fantastic and if you’ve got a different version of Elements, there’s probably a book tailored to that specific version. Just make sure you get one authored by Kelby. He really is a fantastic author.

  12. Ella

    If i could reach through the computer to shake your hand i would.

Leave a Reply


PMA 2010

    Subscribe

  • Photography Bay on Twitter




Recent Comments:

  • Alan: Im not bothered either way Canon or Nikon I use both. Which system does the tester gravitate towards?
  • Justin: What do you think about the lack of optical/sensor image stabilization in the H90? Would this fact alone prompt an upgrade to the...
  • bov: thank you eric. this has been my thoughts exactly since i bought a D5000 and found out i could only use AF-S lenses. i like the...
  • Sky: “I understand that you needed to pull the AF motor out of these camera bodies in order to make them smaller. ”...
  • d700: nikon will not totally replace the d700 with d800 ,, d800 will the new model maybe. d700 still remain some feature that d800 dun...
  • Tob: Sure, it would be nice, but I believe that there are lenses in the line up, which would make even more sense. While a 50mm f/1.8...
  • Cyndi: Anyone find any way around the difficulty editing the video files from the Canon T1i using Windows Live Movie Maker? I use it to...
  • Jerome Taylor: A 50mm f/1.8 AF-S would be a great addition for Nikon. I use the AF-D on my D90 which does have the focusing motor built...